Building stimulus on Capitol Hill

2030 Challenge Stimulus Plan: Emission reductions, jobs, and economic benefits across the country 3

Architecture 2030 uncle samPresident-elect Obama has committed to economic recovery, energy independence, carbon-neutral buildings by 2030, and an 80 percent reduction in U.S. greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. Architecture 2030 has developed a groundbreaking economic stimulus plan [PDF] that simultaneously addresses all of these issues, with a single investment. Kristina Kershner and I presented the 2030 Challenge Stimulus Plan to policymakers and industry leaders in the nation’s capitol last week. It is gathering steam.

The Plan takes a focused approach, strategically inserting scarce investment dollars into the economy to get the widest range of benefits. With a federal investment of $85.56 billion each year for two years, the Plan will, in just two years:

  • create over 8 million new jobs and
  •  
  • create a new $1.6 trillion renovation market.

In just five years, it will:

  •   save consumers $142.33 to 200.88 billion,
  •  
  •   reduce CO2 emissions by 481.13 million metric tons,
  •  
  •   reduce energy consumption by 6.17 quadrillion btu,
  •   save 1.83 trillion cubic feet of natural gas, and
  • save 83.35 million barrels of oil.

The Plan accomplishes all of this and more using a simple, equitable, elegant approach that integrates a mortgage buy-down program for residential buildings and an accelerated-depreciation program for commercial buildings with the energy efficiency targets of the 2030 Challenge (see box below). By tying stimulus funding to the 2030 Challenge targets, the Plan revitalizes the U.S. economy while shifting it toward energy efficiency and clean energy.

This powerful and comprehensive Plan benefits all Americans, no matter what income level or location in the country. The new demand for energy efficiency upgrades and infusion of capital will create over 8 million new jobs, including a new $1.6 trillion renovation market that will put the construction industry back to work immediately. Due to the large number of products and services involved,  investment in the building sector would spread across the U.S. and across industries (from steel, insulation, and caulking to mechanical, electrical, and solar equipment, glass, wood, metals, tile, fabrics, and paint) and sectors (from design, engineering, banking and development to manufacturing, construction, wholesale, retail and distribution).

In addition, the $142.33 to 200.88 billion in consumer mortgage and energy savings will provide much-needed disposable income to fuel economic growth. The reductions in energy consumption and CO2 emissions will put the country on the path to energy independence and signal our commitment to addressing climate change. The icing on the cake is that the cost of the Plan will be paid back each year through the new tax base created by the new jobs.

Separately, Architecture 2030 has called for updating the National Model Building Energy Codes to achieve overall energy savings, compared to the 2006 IECC for residential buildings and ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2004 for commercial buildings, of at least: 30 percent by 2010, 50 percent by 2016 and 75 percent by 2022, reaching carbon neutral in 2030.

The 2030 Challenge Stimulus Plan bridges the gap between 2009 and the implementation of the updated National Codes in 2011. While addressing the country’s immediate needs, it builds a foundation of experience and momentum, easing the transition to the updated codes that will transform the U.S. building sector by 2030. Investing in the building sector is the only investment that can accomplish all of these objectives.

The simplicity of the 2030 Challenge Stimulus Plan and its potential for wide-ranging, positive, and immediate impact have garnered a lot of attention on the Hill. The Plan is now being reviewed by Obama’s transition team.

Download the full Plan  [PDF].

——-

From Transition Team Weighing Blockbuster Housing and Stimulus Proposal by David Sassoon:

Here’s how the 2030 Stimulus Plan plan works.



If you are a homeowner, you can bring your mortgage rate down 2 or 3 or 4 points—with Uncle Sam picking up the difference—if you improve the energy efficiency of your home. It’s an offer you can’t refuse, because it means you can save hundreds of dollars on a typical monthly mortgage, plus hundreds more in reduced energy bills—in perpetuity.



Those savings immediately go in to family coffers and can get spent, stimulating the economy. At the same time, all the demand for energy efficiency upgrades creates millions of jobs. The government recoups its investment in the mortgage buy-down from the income tax collected from the newly employed. And greenhouse gas emissions go down dramatically.



Mazria walked me through a hypothetical example that highlighted the huge incentives the plan could unleash. Say you’re a homeowner with a $272,000 mortgage at 5.55%, paying about $1550 a month. You decide you want your mortgage rate to drop to 3%. In order to qualify for the reduction, you have to improve the energy efficiency of your home 75% below code, and it’s going to cost you a pretty penny: about $40,000.



Existing tax credits would take care of about $10,000 of that cost. The rest would get tacked on to your existing mortgage, bringing it up to $302,000. But, at 3%, you’d be paying only about $1280—saving almost $300 a month on the mortgage alone, plus another $150 in reduced energy costs. The value of your home rises, you have more disposable income, you’ve given work to someone to do the upgrades for you—and s/he’s now paying federal taxes, and you’ve reduced your carbon footprint.



President-elect Obama has committed to economic recovery, energy
  independence, carbon-neutral buildings by 2030 and an 80% reduction in
  US greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. Architecture 2030 has developed a
  groundbreaking economic stimulus plan that, with a single investment,
  simultaneously addresses all of these issues.

 

Edward Mazria is an internationally recognized architect and the founder of Architecture 2030, which aims to rapidly transform the building sector from a major contributor of greenhouse-gas emissions to a central part of the solution to the global-warming crisis.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. archigeek Posted 2:08 am
    17 Dec 2008

    Nice...but...Suppose you can't get your home down 75% from current levels because, well, let's use my own house as an example: Solid brick construction of aproximately 1000sq. ft. with a flat roof. I have already installed a high-efficiency furnace(6-7000USD: 92+ AFUE), a TPO(thermoplastic polyolefin) roof w/1.5" polyiso insulation(6600USD). I was planning on solar thermal water heating, but my budget ran out. Since I'm also restoring some of the houses' architectural historic elements(original galvanised cornice and associated parapet cap pieces, windows, brick repointing), my budget was to improve and stabilise the exterior of the building so that over the years I could concentrate on the interior without worrying if I'll need more exterior work. All of this has cost in excess of 22,000USD, not counting the insulation I'll be putting in the attic crawlspace of my flat-roof home, or the cornice work. The cost of blown-in insulation will only be 6-700USD, but in order for the contractor to access the entire space, I'll need to hire someone to come in and drywall, tape and mud the holes I'll need to make in the ceiling (approx. 1'x 12' in the back-of-the-house kitchen, and 1' x 1' in the front of the house), another couple of hundred, offhand. I'm not certain how else we'll be able to incur any more savings. PV is not an option, simply too much cost. Furring out the interior walls and insulation the cavities would also involve a significent cost, in addition to the fact we'll need to move out of the house for a month or two while the work is done. Three cats, all of our stuff we can't cram into our basement, living expenses while we're away from the house (we might be better than some: my older bro' owns 4-5 rental properties on his block. One or two units always seem to be vacant). All of this is good idea, but you'll have to illustrate how urban homeowners with solid-masonry construction will ba able to benefit. Well, anyone with solid-masonry construction. In addition, if all the components are not installed properly, the 75% figure won't be acheived. I'd love to remove a large portion of my energy expenses from the oil, gas and coal/nuke nipple, but my guess is that because of the type of constuction, my options may be limited to such an extent that I couldn't benefit from this program. So I'll need the nice architects at A2030 to explain how I, as the owner of a solid-masonry structure, may benefit from their program. Get to work, folks...

    The mellotron is your friend.
  2. Sam Wells Posted 3:25 am
    17 Dec 2008

    Good points ArchiGeekThere are a variety of building types that might be a challenge, but I'm on board - although I'm glad it's a voluntary program because I don't wanted to be boxed into a corner.
    With property values falling, upside-down property values, and more foreclosures, it does seem to be an uphill fight. Maybe start off by saying the example house is $250K but is worth only $200K on the market, and then walk us through the math.
    Aha! If you sell the house, you've jacked up the mortgage price to almost $300K but the value is still ... $200K. To sell, one would have to fork over more money or do something really radical like walking away from it. Oops, energy savings didn't turn into any real market value, did it?
    To fix the problem, either side will work - $50K for the mortgage relief or nearly that for the energy improvement.  Take your pick.  

    Onward through the fog
  3. Edward Mazria's avatar

    Edward Mazria Posted 3:29 am
    17 Dec 2008

    Many Strategies AvailableThere are 3 other tiers of mortgage rate buy downs, 30% below and 50% below code and carbon neutral. Download the Plan for these. Not knowing your particular building or where you live I suggest the following. First the easy applications, overhangs on south windows, summer shading on west windows for lowering cooling bills, insulating window quilts for nightime insulation over glazing in cold climates. On  historic flat roof buildings in cold climates, you may be able to add skylights with skylids to turn them in heat gainers in winter and shaded and operable in summer for natural ventilation. Solar hot water is an add-on, cost effective, 30% tax credit from the Feds and other tax credits and incentives in many states. Photovoltaics is also an add-on with a 30% Fed tax credit, many states also have incentives. When the solar incentives are added to the mortgage rate buy down it becomes a positive cash flow investment. I'm sure there are many other strategies and products that can help you meet one of the targets.

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement