Big Oil: 'World has reached peak petroleum'

Half of oil and gas CFOs say we are peaking 4

peak_oil2.jpg

It’s amazing enough that the normally staid International Energy Agency recently said we’ve run out of time.  Now Business Wire reports:

According to a new survey by BDO Seidman, LLP, one of the nation’s leading accounting and consulting     organizations, 48 percent of chief financial officers (CFOs) at U.S. oil     and gas exploration and production companies agree that the world has     reached its peak petroleum (liquid hydrocarbon) production rate or will     reach it within the next few years, while another 52 percent disagree     with that statement.

I think the headline is wrong, though:

Energy CFOs Are Split on World’s Peak Petroleum Production Rate, According to BDO Seidman, LLP.

Chief Financial Officers at exploration and production companies are arguably the most cautious “show me the money” people in the entire energy business.  The news is not that they are split.  The news is that half think we are peaking or soon will.

The point is, it is not just the “peakists” who think we have a big, big problem.  And it’s not just the CFOs.  The CEO of Royal Dutch/Shell emailed his employees, “Shell estimates that after 2015 supplies of easy-to-access oil and gas will no longer keep up with demand.” The CEO of French oil company Total S.A., said that production of even 100 million barrels a day by 2030 will be “difficult.” The CEO of ConocoPhillips said, “I don’t think we are going to see the supply going over 100 million barrels a day.”

Remember, the problem is far graver than it appears for one simple reason: Replacing oil in the transportation sector requires strong government action two decades before a peak because of the time needed to replace vehicles and fuel infrastructure. That was the conclusion of a major study funded by the Bush Department of Energy in 2005 on “Peaking of World Oil Production” [PDF]. The report notes:

The world has never faced a problem like this. Without massive mitigation more than a decade before the fact, the problem will be pervasive and will not be temporary. Previous energy transitions (wood to coal and coal to oil) were gradual and evolutionary; oil peaking will be abrupt and revolutionary.

Ouch! The same point is true about global warming. If we want global carbon dioxide emissions to peak and start declining, the planet must start aggressive mitigation policies two decades in advance—which means now, for the 450 ppm-ers or the 350-ppmers.

The time to act is now.

This post was created for ClimateProgress.org, a project of the Center for American Progress Action Fund.

Joseph Romm is the editor of Climate Progress and a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. Pompey Road Posted 1:49 am
    15 Jan 2009

    Peak Peak in Appalachia:We have also hit peak peak in appalachia. I don't remember the geologic epic or era when the Appalachian Mountain chain was developed but as of 1977 we had our last mountain formed.
    The early 80's is when we discovered all the easy coal had been mined in East Ky. and W. Virginia with the exception of the small seams near the tops of the mountains we could exploit if we could only just blow the tops of the mountains off and shove the overburden into the valleys. It was the only way really we could compete with the cheap to mine western coal.
    So peak oil is especially disturbing to hear down here in the appalachian coal fields. It only means the increased demand for coal combined with the fact all our easy coal is gone except around the mountain peaks will contibute to our peak peak problem.
    We are losing peaks at an accelerated rate plus valleys and fresh water streams. Peak oil and peak peaks will guarantee the demise of thousands more before we can get Mountain Top Removal stopped.



    The eons of time and nature was good to us down here. It was not until we become civilized that destroying our habitat become fathomable or fashionable.
  2. archigeek Posted 3:09 am
    15 Jan 2009

    and more...Read the article about black lung linked from the "Blago's symbolic..." article. Quite an eye opener. It seems that the less desirable seams, in additon to being more costly to extract, are also producing silica concentratons which vastly exceed the safe limits of human intake. Thus producing what may be thousands of cases of silicosis, not black lung. Which conclusion, I'm guessing, will come in handy to those who advocate for increased use of mountain-top removal methods. A spurious argument (essentially trading one evil for another) to be sure, but one which I fear will be picked up by the usual marketing propagandists at Peabody and Massey, et al.

    The mellotron is your friend.
  3. GlobalWarmingInc Posted 4:40 am
    15 Jan 2009

    It's too bad...But not a surprise since congress keeps voting down offshore and other domestic drilling. What did they think would happen?
    The more we drill now (using current clean technology) the quicker we'll be able to use it -meaning less reliance on terrorist oil.
    But hey, as long as the rich people can't see the drilling rigs from their posh beach houses, then we're better off right?
  4. GreyFlcn Posted 9:40 am
    15 Jan 2009

    re: GlobalWarmingIncYou do realize Oil is a global commodity, right?

    http://greyfalcon.net/oilprice.png
    Middle East countries will be able to sell their oil at nearly the same prices, almost no matter what we do.

    http://greyfalcon.net/dilbert2.png
    The only way to significantly devalue their oil, is to move away from oil.

    -David Ahlport

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement