Adaptation -- or climate crime?

The Versace beach will be refrigerated 4

 

dubai-ss_property_347969h.jpg

Is this a sign of the times to come or a sign of the crimes to come?  The UK Times reports:

Versace, the renowned fashion house, is to create the world’s first refrigerated beach so that hotel guests can walk comfortably across the sand on scorching days. The beach will be next to the the new Palazzo Versace hotel which is being built in Dubai where summer temperatures average 40C and can reach 50C.

 

  The beach will have a network of pipes beneath the sand containing a coolant that will absorb heat from the surface. The swimming pool will be refrigerated and there are also proposals to install giant blowers to waft a gentle breeze over the beach
.

And in the understatement of the year, the Times adds:

 

The scheme is likely to infuriate environmentalists.

 

I’m guessing the resort will also be introducing Hummer golf carts and coal-powered jet-skis. Then again, maybe the snarkiness is premature. Maybe this will be a "sustainable" refrigerated beach:

However, Soheil Abedian, founder and president of Palazzo Versace, said he believed it is possible to design a refrigerated beach and make it sustainable.  "We will suck the heat out of the sand to keep it cool enough to lie on," he said. "This is the kind of luxury that top people want."

 

Note to Soheil Abedian — we have a sustainable refrigerated beach,  and it’s called the West Coast of the United States. But if you really wanted to make this "sustainable" then at least power it with solar thermal baseload — you’re in a friggin’ desert after all.

Hyder Consulting, a British construction consultancy, is overseeing the engineering on the project. The hotel will be marketed strongly in the UK where Dubai is a popular tourist destination,  attracting about 800,000 Britons a year.

 

Terrific, the British can cut their own emissions sharply and then fly elsewhere to detroy the planet (see "UK goes for 80% cut").

  Competition to serve the world’s rich is getting intense, especially in Dubai. The city already boasts the world’s first seven-star hotel, the Burj Al Arab, while Armani, a competitor with Versace, is building a similarly branded Dubai hotel.
 

 
The refrigerated beach is designed to give Versace the edge in this battle of luxury lifestyles. The system will be controlled by thermostats linked to computers.

 

Versace’s plans have shocked environmentalists. Rachel Noble, the campaigns officer at Tourism Concern, which promotes sustainable tourism, said that the carbon generated by such projects would contribute to climate change, whose worst effects would be felt by the poor.


  "Dubai is like a bubble world where the things that are worrying the rest of the world, like climate change, are simply ignored so that people can continue their destructive lifestyles," she said.



Aided by cheap oil and gas, Middle Eastern nations have poured enormous resources into controlling temperature. About 60% of Dubai’s huge power bill is for air-conditioning; each person living there has a carbon footprint of more than 44 tons of CO2 a year.
 

 

These plans should not just be shocking to environmentalists. They should be shocking to anyone who cares about the health and well-being of future generations. Certainly Americans are in no position to tell others not to destroy the climate, at least not yet.

But the time will come pretty damn soon when such traditional conspicuous consumption will be seen for what it really is, conspicuous self-destruction. As the horrific reality of climate change becomes self-evident, first we will see boycotts of brands like Versace, who apparently want to see the whole world turned into Venice (see "Venice flooding provides glimpse of what’s to come").  Then we will see trade barriers and sanctions against entire countries that refuse to join the planetary struggle to preserve the health and well-being of the next 50 generations.

We have all the wealth we need to act — the lemming-esque luxury of Palazzo Versacci is but one clear piece of evidence that we could easily part with 0.11% of it per year.  Certainly that’s not much to pay to avoid an inundated, ice-free,  desertified planet with one large hot, acidified dead zone in place of our teeming oceans (see "Is 450 ppm politically possible?  Part 0:  The alternative is humanity’s self-destruction").

But hey, when the ocean is dead, Palazzo Versace can just recreate a fake ocean full of tropical fish, corals, and other living creatures driven by a big petroleum-driven wave machine.

What did the Bible say?  The rich ye shall always have with you.  Something like that.

This post was created for ClimateProgress.org, a project of the Center for American Progress Action Fund.

Joseph Romm is the editor of Climate Progress and a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. justlou Posted 3:14 am
    22 Dec 2008

    Compare FootprintsAlthough this sounds terribly screwy, what is the difference between this and snowbirds jumping on a flight from Chicago, New York or D.C. and escaping to their vacation hangouts in Hawaii or anywhere in the southern hemisphere?  
    Measure the carbon outputs and I think you would find the luxury flights to have a much heavier carbon footprint.  
    And I might ask, just when our leaders might be getting serious enough about global warming to begin constraining some of their own conspicuous consumption?  But if Obama can vacation in Hawaii, everyone can, right?  Or if you believe in exceptionalism for the privileged lay out your arguments.  
  2. tico89 Posted 6:06 am
    22 Dec 2008

    PositionsAmericans are in no position to tell others not to destroy the climate, at least not yet
    Always a bit of a dodgy statement, I feel. If a doctor who you know for a fact smokes tells you to quit smoking for your health, do you ignore him because he's being hypocritical?
    Just a small comment, because I do agree that setting an example would be a million times better.
    And a totally bizarre theory: with climate change presumably there will be fewer blizzards, meaning fewer flights cancelled at this time of the year, meaning more emissions from flying. Another source of runaway emissions? Just something that occurred to me during the hours spent in airports and idling on taxiways.
    Bit terrified, to be honest. Decided to return to Grist after several months away, and this article is the first thing I get hit with. I was hoping the world would have become less lunatic, not more. Merry Christmas.

    If I share initials with 'Global Warming', is that a sign?
  3. GlobalWarmingInc Posted 7:23 am
    22 Dec 2008

    This is all Dubai has...Since they're oil reserves won't last, Dubai know this and are throwing every $$ they have at tourism; hence their indoor skiing facility and this new "cooled" beach. You can't blame them for their creativity though...
    As for the worry-worts: The only heat related to Global WarmingTM is the hot air from all these so-called "scientists" blathering on, trying to scare the general public into spending more $$ on "Green" products.
  4. enviroperk Posted 8:32 pm
    15 May 2009

    All you  have to do is pump water from the sea though piping in the sand. You can reclaim a portion heat gained on the output to use in absorption chillers (they use heat gained to create refrigeration ) to cool the hotel. Then you send the resulting water up into a large fountain and misting system that will evaporatively (due to the dry desert climate) cool the area and a portion of the water (from the fountian) is returned to sea at the temperature it was extracted. The pumps should all be powered by a solar array and would probably be idle when the sun wasn't shining and they are not needed. With enough offsetting heat/cool work required, heating and cooling transfer problems can be fairly energy efficient.On futher thought, you could have concete tall chimenys with misters in the top and air outlet in the bottom to create a fairly strong breeze across sections of the beach. Though it will be a salty breeze. When you have all of the energy falling on the desert and water nearby there are lot of options.Oh yeah, it takes a lot of money which doesn't appear to be much of an issue here.  

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement