Green Light: Charge it

Nissan to bring EV network to Seattle 3

Nissan EV prototype.Like many other urban places, Seattle will welcome an electric vehicle network to the Emerald City.

In a nonexclusive partnership with Nissan North America, the city of Seattle will promote the development of electric-charging infrastructure.

“The city is committed to creating an environment that is kind to EVs,” said Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels (D).

However, the agreement between the manufacturer and the municipality does not go so far as to commit to any specifics. Instead, Nissan will take the lead in establishing local working groups to evaluate sites for possible charging stations. The city will in turn “consider” adopting those suggestions.

The announcement of the partnership also revealed the city’s plans to mandate residential permits for EV home charging stations. This news was met with surprise from Plug In America director Dan Davids. “I charge my EV in an old dryer outlet in my garage,” he said. “I don’t know anything about a permit.”

Permitting issues aside, the concept EV that Nissan intends to introduce in the Seattle area in 2010 will charge on a standard 220-volt line and go 100 miles on a four-hour charge, said Mark Perry, director of product planning and strategy for Nissan North America.

When pressed for details on the number of vehicles Nissan hopes to bring to the Seattle market or the amount of charging stations to expect or even how the permitting process will work, Perry responded, “it’s day one of the partnership. Give us some time to figure it out.”

Nissan-Renault has formed similar partnerships with the countries of Israel, Denmark, Portugal, Monaco, the U.K., France, Switzerland, Ireland, China, and Hong Kong. In the U.S., Nissan’s Seattle partnership will further its campaign to dominate the West Coast EV scene with other projects in Oregon, California, and Arizona.

Since 2008, many countries and urban areas have begun to adopt electric vehicle networks. Better Place projects are the most well-known, but as in the case with Seattle’s EV network, auto manufacturers have made parternships with municipalities to establish EV-friendly communities. Nissan does it a lot.

Nissan North America will offer its electric vehicles on the mass market starting in 2012.

In other green auto news ...

• Fiat of Fiat-Chrysler-Italian-savior-of-the-American-auto-industry fame is actually the world’s leading producer of natural-gas engines. The automaker hopes to sell 120,000 natural-gas vehicles in Europe this year, and with T. Boone Pickens’ very enthusiastic blessing, Fiat hopes to bring the technology to the U.S.

• Screw the economy, people want hybrids ... in Japan.

• Norway considers a proposal to start banning sales of fossil-fuel powered cars in 2015.

Sara Barz is a writer based in Seattle.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. paulcleese Posted 7:49 pm
    28 Apr 2009

    Whats the perfomance like?  back hair removal
  2. enviroperk Posted 10:10 pm
    29 Apr 2009

    I hesitate to post this because of the complicated engineering justification that will have to follow and it is an uncomfortable and unpopular fact,  but it needs to be said:The hybrid wins in the hybrid vis-a-vis full electric, UNLESS all of the charging is done with solar, wind power, hydro or nuclear sources.Why? The conversion efficiency or heat rate of a fossil fuel electric plant is only 30-35% less transmission loss of 8% and battery losses of 10%, recharging power supply losses of 8% or so. In addition, an electric car simply moves the point of pollution to the power plant.A petroleum burning hybrid converts 70- 80% of the BTU value of fuel to the motion of the vehicle. So if your goal is to get the pollution out of the cities to the power plants elsewhere, EV's will do that. If you want to minimize CO2 per mile, hybrids do that at least three times more effectively.So, why is EV cheaper per mile? In dollar-cost it is cheaper because coal is cheaper than petroleum per BTU, MUCH CHEAPER. Coal is not cheaper on a tons of CO2 per mile basis (note: about 49% of the US electricity is produced with coal).So if you drive an EV with grid based recharging, you are really driving a 50% coal-burning car.  You won't feel it or see it, but the environment will.Though I haven't analyzed a VW diesel vehicle that gets 50+ MPG, I suspect that that would be less polluting on a CO2 basis, than a 2009 Prius. However, the nasty micro particles of high-compression combustion of diesel is a whole 'nother hidden health issue, that may rival the mercury-from-coal-in-fish problem.( I mostly ride a bike )
  3. danielthompson Posted 2:18 am
    04 May 2009

    This car is perfect for city life. 4 hours of charging time is perfect. I think this could be the way of the future. Thansk for the article.

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement