The whole world is watching

U.N. chief will pressure senators on climate bill 1

Ban Ki-moonUN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon at a press conference in Seattle (Oct. 26, 2009).Jon Hiskes / GristAs the U.S. Senate begins work on a climate and energy bill this week, senators shouldn’t be surprised if they get a phone call from the guy who counts every person on Earth as a member of his constituency. Ban Ki-moon, Secretary General of the United Nations, said Monday that he plans to contact senators to urge them to pass a bill before December.

“I’m going to engage myself with not only government leaders but with senators of the United States,” Ban said at a press conference in Seattle.

He didn’t elaborate on who, or how, or what strategy he would employ to jumpstart the world’s most deliberative deliberative body. But his pledge illustrates how heavily the American legislative process weighs on the minds of those preparing for the UN climate conference in December.

China, India, Brazil, South Africa, and Mexico are all “ready to make some political compromises only if and only when the United States is ready to [pass a bill],” Ban said. “Leadership and initiative from the United States will be crucially important at this time. We have only six weeks to go. We don’t have much time.”

Ban maintained that reaching a treaty in December was still his goal, even as prospects for that diminish. He acknowledged that work toward a treaty would likely continue after the Copenhagen conference concludes, though he added, “I’m sure we will have an agreement there.”

Ban was in Seattle to accept an honorary degree from the University of Washington. He also stopped by the home of Bill and Melinda Gates to discuss ways to address maternal death rates and child health.

I asked him what benchmarks would make an effective U.S. climate bill, and Ban said it wasn’t his role to become involved in a domestic bill.

“Even with this domestic legislation, it may not be sufficient, but it can have a huge political impact with other negotiators, other countries,” he said.

Ban did sketch (in broad terms) what he considers the most crucial elements of an international climate treaty, largely echoing his op-ed in Monday’s New York Times. First, it must have ambitious mid-term targets for emissions. (He mentioned goals for 2020, as opposed to, say, 2050.). They must be backed by binding commitments. And wealthier countries must supply “substantial” financial aid to help poor countries adapt to the impacts of climate change.

Jonathan Hiskes is a Grist staff writer. He reports, tweets, eats, asks questions, self-promotes, looks out windows, and wonders if it could be like this.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. Anna Marie Posted 9:37 am
    27 Oct 2009

    I'd like to add yet another reason that action on climate change cannot be forestalled. Check out the following op-ed in The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists by Admiral Lee Gunn, President of the American Security Project – Gunn argues that climate change will become one of the most pressing national security challenges in the years to come: http://www.thebulletin.org/web-edition/op-eds/climate-change-could-be-the-next-great-military-threat.

    Excerpts:

    “Climate-intensified conflict between mobile populations seeking fresh water amid wanton state instability may prompt future policy makers to deploy U.S. forces not only to combat extremism in the region, but also to provide aid to the hungry and displaced.”

    He believes that the U.S. government must plan – as soon as possible – for the new contingencies associated with climate change, including increased humanitarian crises and mass migrations, conflict over increasingly scarce resources, extremism, and government weakness and failure. Admiral Gunn cites the situation at Diego Garcia as just one example of how military logistics and strategies will be effected by climate change:

    “The British Indian Ocean Territory of Diego Garcia, for example, is home to a critical staging facility for U.S. and British naval and air forces operating in the Middle East and Central Asia. But this atoll sits just a few feet above sea level. If sea levels rise as projected, the facility could be lost, forcing the U.S. and British militaries to adapt and adjust their logistics and operations throughout the region.”

    He recommends the following actions:
    • “Prepare military officers and troops to address the security and humanitarian needs of resource-stressed populations and climate refugees;
    • “Expand global public health programs (e.g., malarial eradication);
    • “Negotiate an agreement with Canada and Mexico to govern the use of fresh water in North America;
    • “Lead the world in developing conflict-resolution mechanisms to mediate between climate change's winners and losers.”

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement