Still affordable

Kerry-Boxer clean energy bill: Chairman’s mark and EPA analysis released 5

Barbara Boxer speaking at a CEJAPA rally.Sen. Boxer speaking at a CEJAPA rally at the Capitol Building in Washington, DC. Photo courtesy The Sierra Club via Flickr At close to 11pm Eastern, Boxer’s office has finally released the chairman’s mark of the Kerry-Boxer bill. This is the version of the bill that will be debated in hearings next week. Concurrently, the EPA has released its analysis of the economic impacts of the bill (PDF).

These are both crucial documents that will see a lot of discussion in coming weeks. Here’s just a few cursory notes.

The main thing to know about the EPA analysis is that it came to roughly the same conclusions as it did about the House bill, ACES. That analysis was broadly positive (see here). Here are the EPA’s four main takeaways, which it says remain unchanged between bills:

(1) the cap-and-trade policies outlined in these bills would transform the way the United States produces and uses energy; (2) the average loss in consumption per household will be relatively low, on the order of hundreds of dollars per year in the main policy case; (3) the impacts of climate policy are likely to vary comparatively little across geographic regions; and (4) what we assume about the actions of other countries has much greater implications for the overall impact of the policy than the modeled differences between the two bills. [my highlights]

So, if anyone asks you what the EPA says about the Senate clean energy bill, just say: costs are low, regional variations are small, and global climate negotiations will determine the ultimate cost. And that’s without considering the benefits—which the EPA’s analysis explicitly does not.

Since the changes between bills wouldn’t have substantial effect on the outcomes, it’s safe to assume that most of them are tweaks made either to make programs work better or to satisfy various political constituencies. More the latter, if we’re being honest.

Here, from Boxer’s office, is a summary of the changes from the House bill (ACES) to the Senate’s (CEJAPA):

Key Changes in the Chairman’s Mark
The Clean Energy Jobs and American Power Act (S. 1733)

Specifies Distribution of Emissions Allowances
The Chairman’s Mark specifies the distribution of the allowances established under the Pollution Reduction and Investment program. The allocations place emphasis on investments in the following areas:

• Energy Intensive and Trade Exposed industries
• Small local distribution companies (including rural electric co-operatives)
• Transportation grants
• Agriculture and forestry
• Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
• Advanced energy research
• Credits for early action
• Energy efficiency and renewable energy worker training
• Nuclear worker training

New Provisions To Address Clean Coal Technology

• The Chairman’s Mark includes new provisions to stimulate development of commercial-scale carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) technologies
• The bonus allowance program is modified to allow for advanced payments of bonus allowances for early actors with a requirement that funded projects will achieve at least a 50% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions.
• The Chairman’s Mark includes provisions that require coal fired power plants to meet emissions performance standards once sufficient commercial-scale CCS technology has been deployed, while also ensuring timely reductions in global warming pollution from coal plants.

Increased Investments in Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

• The Chairman’s Mark increases investments in utility-scale renewable energy generation.
• The 25 percent set-aside for local governments for energy efficiency and conservation block grant continues unchanged.
• The Retrofit for Energy and Environmental Performance (REEP) program is guaranteed a share of the allocation provided to states for energy efficiency and renewable energy.
• Allowances are also dedicated to energy efficiency programs, including a specific requirement that states use some of these funds for thermal energy efficiency projects.
• Priority is given to low and moderate-income households and a dedicated portion of the energy efficiency set-aside is reserved for low-income households and for public housing retrofits.
• The Chairman’s Mark includes a new program that authorizes the EPA Administrator to provide assistance to owners and operators of buildings in the United States that implement energy efficiency measures that meet Energy Star or other relevant standards.

Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Increasing Investments in the Transportation Sector

• A new allocation program with increased investments is established specifically to fund transportation projects that reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Funds are provided for the “Clean-Tea” planning and performance grants program and for Transit formula grants.
• The Clean Vehicles program is modified to place a stronger emphasis on the domestic manufacturing of advanced technology vehicles, including transit vehicles.

Enhanced Agriculture and Forestry Provisions

• A more robust supplemental agriculture and forestry program is included with allocations throughout the life of the bill. The Supplemental Agriculture and Forestry Greenhouse Gas Reduction and Renewable Energy Program is strengthened to ensure measurable reductions in global warming pollution.

Directs Assistance to Rural Communities

• The Chairman’s Mark increases allowances for small electric Local Distribution Companies, including Rural Electric Cooperatives, which will benefit rural electric consumers.
• The Chairman’s Mark includes a new program to provide grants to states and non-profits to improve air quality by replacing outdated wood stoves.

Promotes Advanced Renewable Fuels

• The definition of biofuels in the Renewable Fuel Standard is clarified to make clear that algae-based and other advanced fuels are included.

Enhances the Role of Tribes

• Tribes are recognized in a number of ways throughout the Chairman’s Mark. Tribes receive guaranteed allocations for the energy efficiency and renewable energy program. The Chairman’s Mark also enhances the role that Tribes will play in a number of programs in the bill.

Bigger Market Stability Reserve

• To maintain price certainty and prevent market manipulation, the size of the market stability reserve is increased in the Chairman’s Mark.

 

Greater Assistance for Small and Medium Refineries

• Small business refiners are given additional time to comply with the Pollution Reduction and Investment program. In addition, the domestic fuel production allowance program focuses on small and medium refineries.

We’ll have more on the bill, the EPA analysis, and the hearing that will examine them both next week.

David Roberts is staff writer for Grist. You can follow his Twitter feed at twitter.com/drgrist.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. human power Posted 10:20 pm
    23 Oct 2009

    Okay, I'm being lazy here, but what is the definition of renewable energy being used. Where I live our local public utility just agreed to subsidize (by purchasing power from) a biomass electricity generator. It is to be entirely fueled by unsustainable clear-cutting of the young trees around our degraded rivers. Would this qualify? How about nuclear?

    Personally, I would much rather see individual carbon quotas instituted so that one cannot simply buy the ability to destroy our environment.
  2. laservisor Posted 12:51 am
    24 Oct 2009

    It looks as if we will end up with a weak bill, but it won't matter if the outcome in Copenhagen is what the US negotiators are pushing for: an international regime with little or no compliance. See, for instance, http://www.cprindia.org/morepolicy.php?s=19 and various news updates in http://www.twnside.org.sg/
  3. SusanKraemer's avatar

    SusanKraemer Posted 8:47 am
    24 Oct 2009

    The bill as written now is pretty good. One thing I am not sure of though, is whether it will allow individuals to buy up pollution permits to retire them as the EU allows.

    Little organizations like Sandbag offer people the chance to make polluters cut emissions through cap and trade.

    http://sandbag.org.uk/faq
  4. Daniel Coffey's avatar

    Daniel Coffey Posted 10:07 am
    24 Oct 2009

    With 900+ pages, which I suspect will go largely unread by those who will vote on it (See Michael Moore's film), there is more than ample opportunity for lawyers to earn a living. I remember the halcyon days of the Superfund program and the decades of happy litigation that federal and state legislation brought. As the second-hired employee of the California Superfund program, I got a ringside seat to watch enormous money be spent on all kinds of wild and wooly projects - some even had a beneficial effect. Overall, however, 90% of the money went to lawyers and consultants.

    I hope we're not going to go down that path again. I'd much rather see wind and solar projects spring up than lawsuits get filed.
  5. PompeyRoad Posted 11:46 am
    24 Oct 2009

    I see no provision for displaced miners if the effect of the bill reduces demand for steam coal. This will be especially true for the Eastern Coal fields that can't compete with Western Coal unless they are allowed to use the Mountain Top Removal method for strip mining coal.
    In reality forcing the halt of the most destructive type of mining ever devised would probably add more jobs to the region when the coal corporations are forced to go back underground for coal and mine it right.

    If however the Kerry Boxer Bill works as it should and reduces the amount of energy produced by fossil fuel or at least forces the coal corporations to mine and burn it cleaner the short term layoffs in the coal industry shuld be addressed if they occur. I don't know that the bill does not provide assistance for this as I have not read the bill in it's entirety.

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement