Make it pretty

What Bill McKibben learned from the gay rights march 2

National Equality MarchCourtesy half.apple via FlickrIf the mainstream media is going to largely ignore a mass demonstration on the national mall—such as Sunday’s National Equality March for gay rights—public demonstrations might as well be small, numerous, and spread all over, says 350.org founder Bill McKibben.

Also, they should be beautiful.

McKibben—writer, Grist board member, and an occasional contributor—was reflecting on the future of activism during a call with reporters and bloggers to promote the International Day of Climate Action on Saturday, October 24. Where the equality march was centralized, the climate day will consist of thousands of events scattered across the globe—some rallies, others closer to performance art. Church bells will ring 350 times, mountain climbers will hang “350” banners, and the Maldives Cabinet will hold an underwater meeting in hopes that the island nation won’t end up submerged beneath a rising ocean.

To McKibben, this strategy is more in synch with today’s decentralized online media.

“The world works differently now,” he said on Tuesday’s call. “It’s dispersed. Using that dispersed architecture to rally public sentiment is what we’ve been trying to do.”

The idea is to transcend fights over specific policies (cap-and-trade vs. a carbon tax, for example) by focusing on the bigger picture: the need to reduce the world’s level of carbon dioxide. Many of the events will highlight the number 350, which McKibben sees as an effective rallying cry. (Go here for a good explanation of 350.)

“There’s something wonky and arcane about taking a scientific data point and making it the center of a campaign,” he said. “But it seems to have succeeded. More than succeeded—it’s gone viral. We need it now to go swine-flu viral.”

Jonathan Hiskes is a Grist staff writer. He reports, tweets, eats, asks questions, self-promotes, looks out windows, and wonders if it could be like this.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. Rip Van Winkle's avatar

    Rip Van Winkle Posted 9:03 pm
    14 Oct 2009

    How do you see the Equal Rights March as having been ignored by mainstream media? It was covered by the NY Times, as well as many other major newspapers. CNN, Fox et al may have dropped the ball, but they're so sensationalized by now that I find it unlikely they'd cover anything that doesn't involve the old standbys- sex and violence.
  2. heart inspiration's avatar

    heart inspiration Posted 9:21 am
    20 Oct 2009

    This is a great point/perspective. I think what the author means is that the average American watching the nightly news or their local news, or reading their local newspaper, problably didn't hear about the march. Or they heard a neutral sentence about it, which didn't make them think anything other than "oh, why are those people so upset? I'm glad they didn't riot."

    A similar thing happened with the recent Pittsburgh rallies against globalization. The mainstream media reported enough that normal people thought the demonstrators were violent crazy-people. The big media now tends to ignore, or demonize, demonstrations. I think the author's praise of smaller, beautiful, actions is right on-target. Maybe that will get the public's attention.

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement