Kay Bailey HutchisonSen. Kay Bailey Hutchison sent the following letter to Grist reader Blanca Estela in early October, responding to questions about the senator’s stance on climate legislation. Hutchison says she opposes a cap-and-trade system, arguing that it would raise energy prices for average Americans and cause economic hardship. She says she does want to invest in alternative energy.
Dear Friend:
Thank you for contacting me regarding the American Clean Energy and Security Act. I welcome your thoughts and comments.
In our effort to reduce emissions, I believe we must invest in alternative sources of energy. Wind, solar, nuclear, and biomass are clean, safe and effective sources of power. Their increased use would create thousands of jobs and allow us to produce energy for Americans, by Americans.
Some Members of Congress have expressed their intent to mandate a cap-and-trade policy to be imposed on all Americans. I believe that cap-and-trade would increase energy prices. In 2008, Peter Orszag, who then served as the Director of the Congressional Budget Office, and who now serves as the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, testified before the U.S. Senate’s Committee on Finance on the implications of a cap-and-trade regime. In his testimony, Director Orszag stated, “Under a cap-and-trade program, firms would not ultimately bear most of the costs of the allowances but instead would pass them along to their customers in the form of higher prices.”
For this reason, I believe that a cap-and-trade approach to address climate change would be onerous and would adversely impact the economy. It could create economic hardship for farmers, ranchers, workers and small businesses, in addition to consumers. The last thing our nation needs during this time of economic hardship is higher energy prices and higher levels of unemployment due to a federal mandate passed down from Washington.Track the climate debate and take actionAs cap-and-trade legislation comes before the Senate, I will keep your comments in mind. I appreciate hearing from you, and I hope you will not hesitate to keep in touch on any issue that is important to you.
Sincerely,
Kay Bailey Hutchison
United States Senator
Do you know what your senators think about climate legislation? Ask them, then tell us what you find out.
Comments
View as Flat
Dave from Canada Posted 3:18 pm
14 Oct 2009
Does anyone remember the excuses for rising CO2 emissions during the early 2000s? The economy is growing so fast, that's why emissions are growing; nothing we can do about that...
It's never the right time for the Repugnicans, or anyone else in the pockets of Big Oil...
Permalink
thollandpe Posted 3:38 pm
14 Oct 2009
Sorry I don't have the Texas numbers but you can find them. Between 2000 and 2008, the average Massachusetts family paid $4000 a year more for energy.
Electricity went from 10.5¢ to 16.1¢ per kWh, $600 a year more.
Heating oil went from $1.31 to $3.21 a gallon, $1520 a year more.
Gasoline went from $1.22 to $2.89 a gallon, $1850 a year more.
That's about $4000 a year, THE COST OF DOING NOTHING. We need a framework that puts a price on the environmental, political, and national security penalties inherent in fossil fuels like oil and coal. Cap & trade may not be perfect but it's way better than business as usual.
Enough of using us farmers and workers as pawns, the only ones with something to lose are the big energy companies, please stop listening to them and listen to us.
Permalink
Tasermons Partner Posted 4:23 pm
14 Oct 2009
Plus, if she does get elected, Houston mayor Bill White (who has implemented many environmental policies and does support GHG regulation) has said he will run for her seat. I believe it likely that he will win, given that he won the Houston elections by wide margins.
Permalink
Des Emery Posted 5:16 pm
14 Oct 2009
Our time is running out. Where are the lifeboats? The costs of rescue may be a burden, but afterwards we'll count it as money well-spent.
Permalink
Cdrates Posted 6:05 am
16 Oct 2009
Permalink