Road hogs

NASCAR and the high-octane American dream 11

The action at the Talladega Superspeedway.The action at the Talladega Superspeedway.At dawn on a hazy autumn morning, the rising sun spilled over the steel grandstands of the Talladega Superspeedway like foam from a cracked can of Bud. This image likely came to mind because I was lying beneath a tarp in a scrubby Alabama meadow carpeted with empty beer cans—an area known as Talladega’s Family Parking Field C. The 2.66-mile Talladega racetrack, located about 50 miles east of Birmingham, is the world’s second-largest car-racing venue, with a mile-long grandstand built to accommodate more than 140,000 fans. Around my L.L. Bean tent were some 40,000 parked vehicles, most of them flatbeds, SUVs, Winnebagos, and camper vans filled with groggy pilgrims rising to greet a day that would bring them the nation’s biggest semiannual NASCAR racing event.

The National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing claims to hold “17 of the top 20 most-attended U.S. sporting events.” I had come to see what may rank among the world’s most lavish displays of fuel consumption: 40 hot rods, each getting about 5 miles per gallon, hurtling around a strip of asphalt in an infinite loop. This was my first visit to a NASCAR event, and I admit I came with a certain lack of regard for its premise: burning huge amounts of fuel and rubber for the sole purpose of driving around in circles. The ritual seemed careless to me at a time of war in the Middle East, unchecked global warming, and soaring energy prices. But hours later I would leave Talladega with a less skeptical take on the NASCAR phenomenon and a better understanding not just of carburetors and checkered flags but of who we are as a nation—a thrill-seeking, speed-loving, self-propelled, forward-charging culture.

Talladega is NASCAR’s XXL, Big Gulp–sized speedway—the most treacherous and most exciting. Its long straightaways and unusually wide track allow for cars to build up to and sustain speeds of more than 200 mph and to run three or four abreast. Racers don’t brake for turns at Talladega the way they do at smaller tracks; instead they mash their gas pedals to the floor. These conditions raise fans’ expectations for the “big one”—a massive, harrowing multicar wreck.

NASCAR grew out of the 1930s Prohibition era in America’s Deep South, when rural bootleggers rigged standard-looking cars with high-powered engines to outrun the law. The forefathers of NASCAR, wrote historian Neal Thompson, were “a bunch of motherless, dirt-poor southern teens driving with the devil in jacked-up Fords full of corn whiskey—the best means of escape a southern boy could wish for.”

*

Field C, which a week earlier had housed only wildflowers and Alabama Longleaf pines, was now a sprawling tribal village with makeshift neighborhoods and orderly avenues.

Families had been dwelling there for days before the race, many erecting well-appointed encampments with awnings trimmed in Christmas lights, lawn chairs, picnic tables, movie projectors, grills, and coolers stocked with cold American beer. Hoisted above the camps were Confederate flags and tributes to the denizens’ favorite racers.

I had awoken to the ambient stench of beer-soaked crabgrass, cigarette butts, fire pits, and the charbroiled remains of last night’s cookouts. I groped for soap and toothpaste and made my way to a public trailer marked “$5 Showers.” En route, I caught sight of my neighbor shuffling out of his tent wearing nothing but his briefs. He nodded hello, and as he leaned over a propane stove to flip his pancakes, I saw the numeral 8 shaven expertly into his thicket of back hair—a brash, intimate, and wholehearted display of fan loyalty. This tribute to Dale Earnhardt Jr. (whose number has since changed to 88) was a single-digit poem about America’s devotion to speed.

Little and her NASCAR-savvy guide in front of the grandstands.Little and her NASCAR-savvy guide in front of the grandstands.At 1:00 p.m.—just after the national anthem blared over the loudspeakers and a squadron of B-1 bombers buzzed overhead—the green flag dropped. In seconds the chorus of twelve-cylinder combustion engines was echoing through the grandstands with a collective shriek as though the universe was being torn in two. Speed rumbled through the ground and into my bones, and my heart knocked against my rib cage. The air filled with the acrid odor of burnt rubber, hot asphalt, and spilled fuel.

For an up-close, under-the-hood look at the action, I made my way into the pit—the restricted area in the center of the track where the cars are fueled and tuned between laps.

Each of the drivers has a pit crew of more than a dozen mechanics responsible for gassing the cars, changing the tires, cooling the engines, and assessing track and vehicle conditions throughout the race. The mechanics were outfitted in helmets and matching Crayola-colored jumpsuits—cherry red, royal blue, canary yellow. Their polished metal tools—wrenches, jacks, pressurized gas pumps shaped like giant baby bottles—glinted in the sunlight.

Between pit stops, as mechanics lounged on spare tires and casually dragged on cigarettes, I pressed them for some answers about NASCAR’s fuel consumption. The cars get anywhere from 4 to 7 miles per gallon, which means that in a 500-mile race such as this one, averaging 5 mpg, each car would consume roughly 100 gallons of fuel. Multiply that by 43 cars per race, and each event as a whole consumes approximately 4,375 gallons of gasoline (assuming all cars finish). With about 96 U.S. NASCAR races per year spread out across several divisions, that totals over 1 million gallons (factoring practice rounds and adjusting for some shorter races).

You also have to factor in the tires for every race. Several gallons of oil go into the production of a synthetic rubber tire. One car competing in a NASCAR event burns through 40 to 80 tires per race. Additionally, each team has a convoy of 18-wheelers that hauls its race cars across the country from track to track, cumulatively traveling hundreds of thousands of miles per year. Fully loaded, these trucks get around 4.5 miles per gallon, which means that millions of gallons are consumed in just getting the cars to the races.

These numbers are small when compared to the volume of fuel that goes into America’s military endeavors or our daily commutes, let alone our total oil demand. What’s fascinating about this particular form of fuel consumption is that its purpose is sheer entertainment. This is gas consumption as an art form.

Drivers and crews pause before the race to say the Pledge of Allegiance.Drivers and crews pause before the race to say the Pledge of Allegiance.Looking up at the grandstands, I was struck by the appearance of the crowd. For all the wealth of competing logos and gear available to them, by far the stand-out choice among the Talladega fans was patriotic garb: the grandstands looked like a pointillist painting in red, white, and blue. I approached one bystander, a 63-year-old account manager at a North Carolina carpet company who had been coming to NASCAR races since they were held on dirt tracks in the 1950s, and asked him about this apparent connection between stock car racing and patriotism. “Those fellas are fast, proud, fearless go-getters with rebel hearts,” he said, nodding toward the track. “That about sums up the American spirit, don’t it?”

I’d take it a bit further to say that no consumer product more wholly embodies the American ethos than the automobile—“the heartbeat of America,” as Chevrolet famously dubbed it. The word derives from the Greek root auto, “self,” and the Latin mobile, “moving”—words that could be said to define the American dream: we each propel ourselves toward the life and destiny of our own choosing. In these individual pursuits, we also directly consume on average 1.5 gallons of gasoline per person per day. This fuel consumption—roughly quadruple that of the average European—is due in part to the great distances traveled in our sprawled-out, auto-dependent lifestyles, but also to the fact that we have some of the lowest fuel economy standards of any industrial nation—lower even than those of our up-and-coming rival China. All of which contributes to a habit of domestic consumption that far exceeds our ability to produce domestic oil.  

Our penchant for long-distance driving is not surprising in a geographically expansive country that now has nearly 4 million miles of heavily subsidized, well-maintained roadways, low gas taxes, and a hobbled rail system—a country in which driving has become, on the whole, significantly more convenient than public transit. Even in the summer of 2008, when gas prices hit record highs, some three-quarters of Americans vacationed in cars. According to the Department of Transportation, the average American driver travels between 30 and 40 miles per day or nearly 14,000 miles a year—the distance around the equator every 1.8 years.

Packing up my sagging tent in Field C at Talladega, I struck up a conversation with an amiable family from Missouri camped out nearby. The four boys, aged 12 to 19, and their parents had driven 600 miles from home in an RV they’d named “Bigfoot.” It’s a voyage they make every year because, as one of the kids told me, “Getting here is half the fun.”  

I asked how much their fuel bills—in a Winnebago that gets 8 mpg—had been affected by rising gas prices. The father, a tall, bearded man in his fifties cooking a hot dog on a fork over his smoldering fire pit, answered, “It’ll cost you. But we adapt—cutting back on the restaurant stops, maybe going direct instead of taking the scenic route.” But, he conceded, if oil prices keep going up, eventually Bigfoot may not be able to make the journey.

As I surveyed the sea of campers and Winnebagos in Field C, I wondered what would happen to this scene if oil stopped flowing tomorrow. The answer, simply, is that NASCAR would go with it, along with a piece of the American identity and a slice of the American dream.

 

This piece was excerpted from Amanda Little’s book Power Trip: From Oil Wells to Solar Cells—Our Ride to the Renewable Future.

Amanda Little, Grist’s former Muckraker columnist, is author of Power Trip: From Oil Wells to Solar Cells—Our Ride to the Renewable Future. Her articles on energy and the environment have been published in Vanity Fair, Rolling Stone, The New York Times Magazine, Wired, Outside, and New York magazine.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. owlafaye Posted 7:48 am
    09 Oct 2009

    I realize this is an attempt to be relevant regarding the environment however, the shot is a cheap one. NASCAR is a "sport" much like football and a very popular "sport". Your article is laced with inaccuracies and cheap shots re: beer cans, cigarettes, SUV's and Winnebagos, as if everyone is going to show up in Prius' and the beer cans will never go away because the clean up crew is anti-environment. Lots of cheap shots and the author obviously can't even change a tire with his remarks of "12 cylinder" and other comments, he demonstrates a complete lack of knowledge going into the investigation. Next he will complain about all the gas burnt at an air show. This is the kind of foolish journalism that distorts and denies and just dumbs down more Anmericans that believe anything they read...like the anti-gunners and the anti-abortionists.
    1. Tyler Durden Posted 3:11 pm
      09 Oct 2009

      "NASCAR is a "sport" much like football and a very popular "sport"."

      Sorry, you couldn't be more wrong. Auto racing is motorized recreation and requires absolutely no athletic ability. (It requires motor skills ability.) But whether auto racing is a sport, which I consider it not to be, is not an important issue. The important issue is that it glorifies the internal combustion engine, and consumes and burns fuel for absolutely no reason. You may be able to make a somewhat credible argument that cars are necessary evils, but there is no case to be made that ANY motorized recreation is anything but totally needless environmental destruction.
  2. Random Menace Posted 8:46 am
    09 Oct 2009

    You came close, but I think you missed the target: the fuel used by fans getting to and from these huge sport venues. 40,000 vehicles traveling an average of 100 miles consumes at least 50x the amount of fuel as the race cars themselves. And it's not just NASCAR. Many NFL/MLB/NBA facilities suffer from a lack of public transportation access. Case in point: the new Dallas Cowboys stadium in Arlington. Arlington is (in)famous for having no public transit system whatsoever. Cowboys fans have no choice but to drive. Many of these facilities are at least partially financed with public funds. We should require public transportation access as part of any new stadium plan.
  3. owlafaye Posted 9:00 am
    09 Oct 2009

    I think the author should strongly campaign for the elimination of all sports spectacles in America...this would save tons of gas and make her happy...after all, air heads have the right to be happy also, don't they?
  4. achilles_knee Posted 3:48 pm
    09 Oct 2009

    NASCAR is a huge offender when it comes to energy - it's a sport that has a tremendous impact on Americana in terms of how it influences buying decisions, like the next car purchase - and the fact that the cars are still running sixties technology, I mean, carburetors for crying out loud - in huge 6 litre v8 engines with no plans to run anything even remotely resembling an environmentaly responsible formula any time soon - it makes the author correct in her assessment - even if she has no knowledge of racing. Spot on assessment from an outsider equals great journalism.

    Compare NASCAR with other major motorsport - sports car racing develops bio-diesel engines, IndyCars run ethanol, and Formula One uses a Kenetic Energy Recovery system to generate horsepower from braking energy transferred to a battery or flywheel - all efforts to be more environmentally responsible and to impact the auto industry with relevant tech research.

    NASCAR's big move? They just started using unleaded gas...

    Oh and by the way - to the person that claims that motorsport requires no athleticism - you are precisely wrong:

    http://www.formula1.com/inside_f1/understanding_the_sport/5298.html
  5. ferrarimanf355's avatar

    ferrarimanf355 Posted 6:00 pm
    09 Oct 2009

    Sigh. Will you eco-dorks give it up? NASCAR isn't going anywhere, whether you want it to or not.

    Making high-performance cars and racing to be major politically incorrect pariahs, like this article is, is an easy way to lose people like me to the cause. Leave us alone, please.
  6. PNW_BW Posted 1:40 am
    10 Oct 2009

    This article strikes at an issue that is near and dear to my heart:

    I grew up watching motorsports events (mostly NHRA/drag racing and a little NASCAR) on television and in person. The oddity is that I consider myself am environmentally aware. 90% vegeterian, use public transit, persuing an environmental career, limited use of plastics, politically liberal, etc...so not your typical motorsports fan. In the last few years of my life I have been much less into motorsports, but still follow them casually online and on television. I still continue to patronize these forms of entertainment because they have been very important parts of some of my interpersonal relationships with both family and friends. Even though these forms of entertainment stand for many of the things in life that I look down upon (mass use of energy, waste, big corporations, greed, money, etc.) I derive pleasure from the relationships I have in my life that involve motorsports, and I still enjoy the sensory experience that comes from attending these events.

    I read an article in the High Country News (http://www.hcn.org) a few years ago that was written by a person who had similar feelings...Is there anyone else out there in a similar dilemma who shares my feelings?

    Signed with very guilty pleasure,
    A closeted motorsports fan
  7. guade00 Posted 11:59 am
    11 Oct 2009

    I can think of few things less entertaining to watch than NASCAR racing. Golf comes to mind. Lawn bowling. I'd rather watch miniature boats race around our local pond.

    "Those fellas are fast, proud, fearless go-getters with rebel hearts,” he said, nodding toward the track. “That about sums up the American spirit, don’t it?” Nah. Not here in the Northwest. We're a bunch of passive aggressive weenies lacking self-confidence. But at least we know good entertainment--can't beat kvetching over a hot cup of coffee on a rainy day--and know to oppose any thought of putting a NASCAR track around here. Our Priuses use far too much gas as it is.
  8. Mark McIntosh's avatar

    Mark McIntosh Posted 7:17 pm
    11 Oct 2009

    I'm not sure what the point of the article is? I write sports related issues for Grist and I find this authors interpretation of the sport amateurish. While there is little that can be identified as accomplishments on the part of NASCAR for environmental stewardship, they are trying to green up their operations. One has to look for each of the teams to become better stewards rather than any individual race. While the footprint for a race is substantial (I can name one cricket match this weekend that beats the numbers talked about in this article), one has to look towards the individual competitors and their activities to really make a difference in this sport. This article was not a heavy lift.
  9. nealthompson's avatar

    nealthompson Posted 4:45 pm
    12 Oct 2009

    Enjoyed the story, Amanda, and thanks for the mention. (The forefathers of NASCAR, wrote historian Neal Thompson, were “a bunch of motherless, dirt-poor southern teens driving with the devil in jacked-up Fords full of corn whiskey—the best means of escape a southern boy could wish for.”) The book is "Driving with the Devil: Southern Moonshine, Detroit Wheels, and the Birth of Nascar." More info at penandpencilclub.com
  10. roncastle Posted 11:57 am
    13 Oct 2009

    If NASCAR wants to improve their chances of sustainability as a motorized recreation then make a commitment rat naow as we say down south to race only electric vehicles powered by solar and wind energy captured on site at the track.

    Let's start next season and let the racing community lead the way on what makes great electric vehicles.

    Speed will not be the only issue. Racing will include strategies for conserving battery power. Pit crews will develop the best techniques for changing batteries and operating recharging equipment.

    Imagine being at the race and hearing the birds singing. If you have to make yourself deaf you could always listen to a recording of one of the old fashioned races on your iPod.

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Series Intro
Confessions of a fossil-fuel addict 2
Exploring the extreme frontiers of oil drilling 2
NASCAR and the high-octane American dream 11
Can you taste the fuels in your food? 5
Our old electric grid is no match for our new green energy plans 4
The U.S. military's battle to wean itself off oil 4
Advertisement