Welcome to America, Stephen Harper!

Activists drape Niagara Falls with banner to protest tar-sands oil 6

Niagara Falls tar sands oil actionRainforest Action Network hangs a 70-foot banner in front of Niagara Falls, in protest of Canadian tar sands oil.Photo: Rainforest Action NetworkThere’s a 70-foot banner and activists dangling over the observation tower at Niagara Falls. Before dawn this morning, a small team of climate advocates with the Rainforest Action Network rappelled hundreds of feet above the ground, to offer special welcome message to Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper ahead of his first official visit to the White House to push dirty Tar Sands oil.

Not that he’s feeling so welcome anyway. Obama limited the meeting to just one hour. While some have called it a slap in the face, aides say Harper will turn the other cheek. “The economy, and the clean-energy dialogue will dominate the discussions,” one aid told the Globe and Mail. Obama needed to dodge controversy over oil imports from Canada’s tar sands in the midst of the climate legislation debate. Harper needed a story to go with his photo-op.

During Harper’s first official trip to meet Obama in the U.S., the two leaders are expected to discuss climate change and energy policy ahead of the upcoming G-20 Summit. Canada supplies 19 percent of U.S. oil imports, more than half of which now come from the tar sands, making the region the largest single source of U.S. oil imports. The expansion of the tar sands will strip mine an area the size of Florida. Complete with skyrocketing rates of cancer (by 400%!) for First Nations communities living downstream, broken treaties, toxic belching lakes so large you can see them from outer space, churning up ancient boreal forest, destroyed air and water quality, the tar sands have been called the most destructive project on Earth.

Tomorrow’s visit to the U.S. by Prime Minister Harper is the latest attempt by Canadian federal and provincial officials to lock in subsidies for 22 new and expanded refinery projects and oil pipelines crisscrossing 28 states, which would transport and process the dirty tar sands oil. Many are concerned that Prime Minister Harper wants to protect the tar sands oil industry from climate regulation, even though it is one of the fastest growing sources of greenhouse gas emissions in Canada.

“Climate change, one of the biggest security threats of our time, is something Canada and the United States face together. Extracting tar sands oil, which sends three times more climate-changing greenhouse gases into the atmosphere than conventional oil, puts us all at risk,” said Eriel Deranger a member of the Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation and Rainforest Action Network’s Tar Sands Campaigner in Alberta.

As this oil spills into the U.S., communities living near oil refineries face increased air and water pollution, which contains 11 times more sulfur and nickel and five times more lead than conventional oil.

Opposition to tar sands oil has been rising on both sides of the border. Just last month, four Native American and environmental groups sued Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Deputy Secretary James Steinberg and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers over Enbridge Energy’s Alberta Clipper pipeline. If built, the 1,375 mile pipeline would pump 800,000 barrels of tar sands oil per day from Northern Alberta to Midwestern refineries. On the Canadian side, Native activists escalated pressure on the Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) for their funding of the tar sands a few weeks ago.

Canada has no regulations to reduce greenhouse gas pollution, and the federal government’s climate change plan would allow total pollution from the tar sands to increase almost 70 percent by 2020. Tar sands oil production is the fastest growing source of greenhouse gas emissions in Canada and was recently cited as one of the most important reasons Canada will miss its Kyoto targets by over 30 percent.

Carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) used to be the centerpiece of Harper’s pitch. Global warming pollution from coal and tar sands “can be solved by technology,” declared Obama. Not to be outdone, Harper’s office announced that “a strengthened U.S.-Canada partnership on carbon sequestration will help accelerate private sector investment in commercial scale, near-zero-carbon coal facilities to promote climate and energy security.”

Half a year and billions of wasted tax dollars later, though, CCS is still a pipe dream. FutureGen, North America’s supposed proving ground for the unproven technology, can’t keep private investors to save it’s life. Two of its biggest private backers, Southern Co. and AEP, jumped ship last June. Around the same time, sponsors lowered the goalpost on the project to just 60 percent less carbon. So much for near-zero-carbon facility. Projects promised in the tar sands are fairing even worse.

No matter. Harper is back, hat in hand, looking for legislative giveaways for an industry destined to ruin the climate.

So here’s our welcome to you, Prime Minister Harper. Now, please, go home.

And take your dirty tar sands with you.

 

Joshua Kahn Russell is the Grassroots Actions Manager for energy and climate at Rainforest Action Network. He is also an action strategy trainer with the Ruckus Society.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. Juliettelucie Posted 2:56 pm
    15 Sep 2009

    Pressure in Canada too - Greenpeace is blocking Shell's operations from the inside: http://www.greenpeace.org/stoptardsands
  2. dtrom4 Posted 6:48 am
    16 Sep 2009

    I don't really get it.  They're protesting Canada?  But "Clean Energy Future" points toward Canada and "Tar Sands", which come from Canada, point to the US?  Or is it because the US is importing tar sands?  If they're just saying "Clean Energy Future" should be the future and "Tar Sands" should be the past, then they're overlooking the symbolism of putting it on the border, which is then confusing.
  3. Dave from Canada Posted 11:39 am
    16 Sep 2009

    Boosting profits for fossil fuel corporations - normally a key goal for Harper, who is in their pockets - will not be his priority for this visit.Harper is positioning for a fall election.  So what he will want from this visit is not necessarily concessions for Big Oil, but rather any sort of "agreement," photo-op, or other positive news story that aligns him with Obama (who is far more popular in Canada than Harper is).If Harper wins the election, Canada will do its very best to prevent any international agreements on global warming.  Not to mention what he will do to the union movement. So I hope Obama's political staffers will prevent Harper from getting any media bump off this visit.  Are you listening...?
  4. BT Posted 6:27 pm
    16 Sep 2009

    EXCUSE me everyone. Obama should be ashamed that he is even talking to Canada about such a disgusting environmental mess. In your article you say this: Global warming pollution from coal and tar sands “can be solved by technology,” declared Obama.  Is this before or after we destroy the area the size of Florida?  I utterly could not believe that a person who declares himself the champion of our planet made such a laughable statement.  Even Bush never suggested anything but drilling in Alaska where the damage would have been the size of Central Park.  I guess if we make a mess in another country it is fine but if we do it in our own backyard we are not accountable for the mess.  You tell me what is wrong with this picture?  Let's not forget that the Chinese would take all that tar sand oil if they could get it.  They are taking lots already.  Canada should be ashamed of itself & so should the US for participating in this type of fuel extraction.  Good for the Rainforest Action group. Thank you so much for your work!  Thank you Grist for reporting on this dreadful mess. Keep us informed.  Barbara
  5. Adrian Posted 10:45 am
    17 Sep 2009

    Check out this great article on MSNBC, about this action and Greenpeace's Alberta tar sands action in the context of Harper's visit:http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32876728/ns/us_news-environment/The last few days have been a great step forwards in introducing Americans - and American policy-makers - to the environmental catastrophe that is the Alberta tar sands.
  6. BT Posted 3:16 pm
    17 Sep 2009

    The Americans have been introduced to the fact that Obama is the same as Bush. Oil is the king.  As Bush said "we are oil pigs."  No denying that.  At least when it comes from the middle east it is not destroying a part of our earth the size of FLorida. You know all of this environmental talk is just trash.  No one means what they say.   Where have people been in this disaster?  I mean what rock are you living under if you are not upset about the situation in Canada?  I have been screaming about this for 4 years.  National Geographic had an article about this mess with photos.  Hello America - wake up.  Do not try and make excuses for policy makers. They know darn well what is going on and they chose to ignore it.  BT  

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement