Hi, cotton

Arkansas’ Blanche Lincoln grabs Senate ag committee chair [UPDATED] 1

cottonBlanche Lincoln: bully for industrial cotton growers; bad for climate change mitigation.

[Note: This post has been updated to reflect confirmation that Blanche Lincoln will take the top Senate Agriculture Committee post. Additional updates at bottom of post—including information about Lincoln’s status as a favorite of agribusiness funders.]

Late yesterday afternoon marked a dark moment for sustainable-ag advocates. Sen. Christopher Dodd (D-Conn.) announced he had decided against taking over Teddy Kennedy’s chairmanship of the Senate’s health committee, setting in motion a game of musical chairs that has propelled Blanche Lincoln (D.-Ark) to the top spot on the Senate agriculture committee. Current ag chair Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) will vacate the seat to take up the health committee chair.

For people hoping for progressive change in U.S. ag policy, this is dismal news. True, Harkin is somewhat sold out to agribusiness interests. For example, he vowed to push an agenda for the climate bill that’s even more agribusiness-friendly than that of his House counterpart, Collin Peterson (D.-Minn.).

But he’s a relatively progressive politician—and he’s been a reliable supporter of important conservation programs, and has been (by today’s standards) a champion of enforcing antitrust principles in highly consolidated agriculture markets. And he might have been expected, for example, to be a positive force in the upcoming fight over the reauthorization of the Child Nutrition Law, which funds the National School Lunch Program. The current version expires Sept. 30; reports suggest it will be extended as is and not taken up until the spring.

By that time, Lincoln will have settled in as committee chair. If Harkin is relatively progressive, Linclon spells unmitigated disaster for ag reform. Here’s how Des Moines Register ag writer Philip Brasher describes her:

Lincoln is as vigorous a proponent for large farms and livestock interests (think Arkansas-based Tyson Foods) as there is in Congress. Pair her with the panel’s senior Republican, Saxby Chambliss of Georgia, and you have a powerful one-two punch for the southern perspective on agricultural policy.

By “southern perspective on agricultural policy,” Brasher means not only a laissez-faire attitude toward meat giants like Tyson, but also generous subsidies for mass-scale cotton farms.

Perhaps worse, Lincoln is in deep political trouble in Arkansas. A solidly conservative Democrat, she nevertheless finds herself a target of right-wing rage for her support of healthcare reform. (Under pressure, she recently withdrew her support for the “public option.”)

She faces re-election in 2010—and until her move to the ag committee chair became imminent, her reelection prospects looked dim. But from her perch at atop the powerful ag committee, she’ll be much more likely to win support of the rural right, an Arkansas political observer speculated this morning.

To do so, she’ll likely make her ag agenda even more regressive. One trembles at what’s in store for the climate bill under her leadership. For her state’s ascending loony right, supporting solid climate-change legislation is tantamount to signing a pact with the Devil and the KGB. Already, she’s taken a hard line on ensuring that the climate bill will either toe the agribusiness line, or not pass at all. Kate Sheppard reports at the Washington Independent:

Lincoln recently called the House climate and energy bill “a complete non-starter,” pledging that the Senate would move more slowly on legislation do more to address regional concerns. Her own concerns have been potential rises in energy costs and impacts on agriculture. As a member of the Energy and Natural Resources Committee, she agreed to support a renewable electricity standard only after it was lowered from 20 percent by 2020 to 15 percent.

Meanwhile, Arkansas-based Tyson Foods has benefitted greatly from the de facto privatization of school lunches—its prefab chicken nuggets are perfect for public schools with tiny lunch budgets and no cafeteria kitchens. Can we count on Lincoln to champion a Child Nutrition Law that mandates fresh, healthy food in schools?

Weirdly, the sustainable-ag movement finds itself in the position of hoping that Arkansas’ birthers, tea baggers, and Glenn Beck acolytes manage to take out a Democratic Senator. Such are these surreal political times.

UPDATE: In a phone conversation, Kate Fitzgerald, a senior policy analyst at the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition, told me that Sen. Lincoln has demonstrated that she “understands the importance” of a robust school-lunch program—and even of one that connects schools to nearby farmers. Fitzgerald told me that during the 2007-‘08 Farm Bill debate, Lincoln did support the principle of “geographical preference”—the idea that school districts can buy locally grown food in when it’s not cheaper. Whether that means Lincoln will champion the budget increases necessary to create such an improved program is a different question—one Fitzgerald had no answer for. Given the furor of the  tea-bagger wing of her constituency, for whom spending on public programs amounts to Bolshevism, it seems doubtful that Lincoln will push for much-needed budget increases.

Meanwhile, I checked out the Blanche Lincoln page at the campaign-finance watchdog Open Secrets website. Agribiz donors have apparently been expecting Lincoln to rise to the top spot—or just really like her work. For the 2009-2010 election cycle, Lincoln ranks as the number-one recipient of donations among all Senatorial candidates from the following ag-related industries: Agricultural Svcs, Crop Production, Food Process/Sales, Forest Products, Poultry & Eggs. For good measure, she’s number two in the cold heart of the dairy industry. Chillingly, given the Senate ag committee’s sway over the climate bill, she’s the top recipient of cash from the Oil & Gas industry.

 

Grist food editor Tom Philpott farms and cooks at Maverick Farms, a sustainable-agriculture nonprofit and small farm in the Blue Ridge Mountains of North Carolina. Follow my Twitter feed; contact me at tphilpott[at]grist[dot]org.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. megaloptera Posted 6:42 pm
    09 Sep 2009

    While Senator Lincoln's position on biofuels and sustainable agriculture are of concern, her leadership in killing off any ACESA-type Senate cap and trade bill is desperately needed.  The Waxman Markey ACESA is a disaster for the planet.  Today, the energy industry announced it is lobbying for even more free allowances than ACESA gave them: Energy-intensive industries want more CO2 permits  (Wednesday, September 9, 2009)Saqib Rahim, E&E reporterEnergy-intensive businesses will push to raise the number of free emissions permits they get under a federal cap-and-trade system, representatives from two of the industries said.The climate bill passed by the House in June, put forward by Reps. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) and Edward Markey (D-Mass.), gives 15 percent of all permits, for free, to energy-intensive industries that are especially vulnerable to international trade. The share would decrease by about 2 percent each year, starting in 2014, before being phased out in 2025.As legislation moves through the Senate, industry representatives say they want to convince Congress to provide more free permits. Not only will they need assistance to pay for carbon, they will argue, but they also need a buffer in case the cap-and-trade bill makes energy prices go haywire."Energy-intensive industries are going to be subject to much higher energy costs as a result of this bill, and that is just as damaging to our industries as the cost of allowances," said Lawrence Kavanagh, vice president of environment and technology for the American Iron and Steel Institute.... Are Senators Boxer and Kerry going to say no?  Don't think so.That's why we need Senator Lincoln's leadership in killing cap and trade.  When we launched Climate SOS on September 1, 2009, we booked a meeting in Little Rock to meet with Senator Lincoln's  State Director to give Ms. Yeargan the details on the harm that ACESA will cause to the planet and our most vulnerable communities.  While we hope Senator Lincoln will take a careful look at the impact of biofuels and biomass burning, she's where she needs to be on cap and trade.Here's today's Climate SOS Tour update:  Climate SOS
    Tour to “Kill The Bill” Has Successful First Stop in Bismarck, North Dakota 
    September 9, 2009,
    Indianapolis, Indiana.  The Climate
    SOS Heartland Tour Team made its first stop on September 8 in North Dakota and
    met with the staff of Senators Conrad and Dorgan.  “We got a tremendous reception from the Senators’ State
    Directors and staff,” said Duff Badgley, Tour Leader.  “We are looking forward to our meetings tomorrow in
    Indianapolis with Senator Bayh and Lugar's staff,” he said.  “Then it’s on to Little Rock where we
    will meet with the State Director for Democratic Senator Blanche Lincoln, who
    is the newly appointed Chair of the Senate Agriculture Committee.   Senator Lincoln is  against cap and trade, and we want her
    to know she has our support on this issue,” said Mr. Badgley.  The Senate Agriculture Committee has
    jurisdiction over large parts of the Senate climate legislation.  Climate SOS is a grassroots
    network of environmentalists, scientists, and social justice activists is
    taking a stand against the upcoming Senate climate change bill and making a
    four state car-free tour to demand new climate legislation that is grounded in
    science instead of politics.  The
    group is primarily volunteers – no astroturfing here.          Climate scientist Dr.
    James Hansen endorses Climate SOS and says a Senate bill based on the U.S.
    House American Clean Energy and Security Act (ACESA), will be "worse for
    the environment than doing nothing." Climate SOS says cap-and-trade
    cannot forestall the climate crisis, more effective means are needed, and
    social justice concerns must be central to any climate legislation.  Climate SOS says a ACESA type cap and
    trade bill will:  • Prevent the U.S. from making its fair share
    of greenhouse gas reductions. • Lock the U.S. into a complex cap-and-trade
    scheme that benefits fossil fuel utilities, Wall Street, and agribusiness. • Use public money to subsidize the most
    polluting industries, drawing much needed financing away from real climate
    solutions. • Add more polluting smokestacks, especially
    in backyards of the poor, people of color, and indigenous communities by
    grandfathering dirty old coal plants, permitting many new ones, and subsidizing
    incinerators as a form of renewable energy in the Renewable Electricity Standard
    (RES). • Trigger rainforest destruction in
    Africa, the Amazon, and Southeast Asia by failing to include indirect land use
    change provisions in the bills biofuel Renewable Fuel Standards (RFS). To contact the Climate SOS Tour on the road,
    call Duff Badgley, cell 206 619 6304 or (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

    //
    var l=new Array();

    var output = '';

    l[0]='>';l[1]='a';l[2]='/';l[3]='';l[24]='\"';l[25]=' 103';l[26]=' 114';l[27]=' 111';l[28]=' 46';l[29]=' 115';l[30]=' 111';l[31]=' 115';l[32]=' 101';l[33]=' 116';l[34]=' 97';l[35]=' 109';l[36]=' 105';l[37]=' 108';l[38]=' 99';l[39]=' 64';l[40]=' 102';l[41]=' 102';l[42]=' 117';l[43]=' 100';l[44]=':';l[45]='o';l[46]='t';l[47]='l';l[48]='i';l[49]='a';l[50]='m';l[51]='\"';l[52]='=';l[53]='f';l[54]='e';l[55]='r';l[56]='h';l[57]='a ';l[58]='

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement