Ad Nauseum

NYC warns residents: “Don’t Drink Yourself Fat” 6

Soda advertisement

While the evidence continues to mount that taxes alone aren’t enough to significantly reduce junk food consumption, the political prospects for passing a federal soda tax appears to be dim. Well, New York City has decided that if they can’t tax your soda, they’ll go after your appetite instead.

...New York City’s public health officials opened a new front in their struggle against high-calorie beverages on Monday, unveiling an ad campaign that depicts globs of human fat gushing from a soda bottle.

“Are you pouring on the pounds?” asks the ad, which urges viewers to consider water, seltzer or low-fat milk instead, and warns: “Don’t drink yourself fat.”

Take a good look at that image, folks. Ah, the pause that nauseates.

It’s easy to dismiss the effectiveness of this kind of ad campaign. Really easy if you’re the American Beverage Association—a spokesman told the New York Times that the ads would “do more harm than good.” Whether the spokesman was referring to the debate over soda consumption or to beverage companies’ bottom lines is unknown.

Yet with kids now drinking more soda than they do milk, it’s entirely possible that many parents simply don’t connect the dots between soda consumption and obesity. Compare any shock the above image may cause to the shock that comes with the revelation that liquid candy has now become a top beverage choice in households across the country—and given that fact it’s hard not to marvel at the shamelessness and outright disingenousness of beverage companies. At this point, anything that gets people looking at soda as an item that simply shouldn’t be part of an everyday diet has a role play.

The fact remains that, as with all policy interventions, the goal is not to end soda consumption entirely—just to reduce it enough to have an impact on obesity rates. Obviously, a single ad campaign isn’t going to do that—but getting government explicitly behind the message that soda isn’t just another drink is a good place to start.

Tom is a media and technology professional who thinks that wrecking the planet is a bad idea. He twitters madly and blogs here and at Beyond Green about food policy, alternative energy, climate science and politics as well as the multiple and various effects of living on a warming planet.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. 970slashX Posted 12:54 pm
    02 Sep 2009

    Fat-free skim milk has 90 calories per 8-ounce serving.  Coke has 93 calories per 8-ounce serving.  I think that the Dairy Council guys got to you if you are in favor of milk over Coke in an obesity column.
    1. Rich Porter Posted 7:14 am
      04 Sep 2009

      Are you making a joke?  If so, that's a funy one! 
      1. 970slashX Posted 11:05 am
        04 Sep 2009

        Rich- it was a joke -- but one with a deadly serious twist.  I'm
        telling you, the Dairy Council is the new manifestation of the
        Illuminati.  I read on the internet that it was the Dairy Council that faked the moon landing and convinced Carl Sagan to denigrate the waters of Lourdes. http://bit.ly/khTvs  Sagan refused to say that milk cured cancer and now where is he?  He is dead.
  2. diana_l Posted 8:15 am
    03 Sep 2009

    Calorie per Calorie, milk is more nutrient dense than soda...more calcium, protien, vitamin D, etc.  I'm still not advocating that people drink more milk, but it is definitely an improvement over soda. 
    1. Farscape's avatar

      Farscape Posted 8:45 am
      06 Sep 2009

      Seems to me that the real culprit in most soda is high fructose corn syrup.  It's been covered on the news from time to time.   A friend of mine stopped drinking coke and pepsi and didn't change her eating habits and lost 58 pounds in one year.  You can get soda without corn syrup - just read the label.
  3. B Posted 11:00 am
    28 Oct 2009

    This sounds like a neat campaign except for possibly encouraging consumption of artificial sweeteners that a lot of people might justify.
    Real juice would be a good, nutritious beverage, except that it is pretty costly for the wallet and resources. Although there is always moderation, as unappealing as it may be for some people.

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement