The Obama administration will defend the Clinton roadless rule that has been ping-ponging in the courts for nearly a decade, Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack said in Seattle on Friday. If courts can’t resolve the forest-protection conflict, the administration will create its own roadless rule, he said.
Vilsack laid out a broad vision for the U.S. Forest Service, outlining for the first time his plan for the agency that manages national forests from within the Department of Agriculture. He promised strong conservation measures and an emphasis on restoring damaged forests, especially those left “overstocked and susceptible to catastrophic fire and disease” by a legacy of fire suppression.
He also spoke to the economic potential of forests in emerging carbon and bioenergy markets and their value as a water source as climate change brings increasingly severe droughts. He hinted at the value of new water markets for private land owners.
“The Forest Service must play a significant role in the development of new markets and ensuring their integrity,” he said, speaking near the old-growth forest at Seattle’s Seward Park. “Carbon and bioenergy aren’t the only new opportunity for landowners. Markets for water can also provide landowners with incentives to restore watersheds and manage forests for clean and abundant water supplies.”
Vilsack made an appeal, in a very Obama sort of way, to environmental leaders, asking them for help in moving past the “history of distrust” between conservationists, the Forest Service, and loggers. In short, he asked them to lay off the lawsuits against government plans.
“Certainly appeals and litigation have served as a useful backstop” against poor forest plans in the past, he said. “But given the scale of restoration that must occur, and the time in which we have to do it, a shared vision built on collaboration will help us move on from the timber wars of the past. Litigation and conflict should become less prevalent, because they will be less necessary.”
Patti Goldman, vice president for litigation at Earthjustice, said she was glad to see a clear departure from Bush administration land management.
“They’re moving into the future,” she said. “That’s a wise move.”
To be sure, the speech was more broad principles than specific plans; Vilsack said those would come in a new forest plan, a regulatory rule that won’t have to pass through Congress.
He also said the Forest Service must address the 80 percent of American forests that lie outside of national forests, under the control of states, tribal groups, businesses, and private landowners.
“The threats facing our forests don’t recognize property boundaries,” he said. “So, in developing a shared vision around forests, we must also be willing to look across property boundaries. In other words, we must operate at a landscape scale by taking an ‘all-lands approach.’”
Vilsack didn’t mention specific measures, but Charlie Raines of the Sierra Club’s Cascade Chapter said ramping up funding for the Forest Legacy program would be an effective way to let forest owners make money off their land without developing it.
McMansions for a recession
How many soldiers does it take to swap a lightbulb?
Steven Colbert grows a "crisis herb garden"
Comments
Post a Comment +
Obama and Liberal Democrats are essentially...monarchists.In the name of "Green" their main purpose is to keep the Commoners off the Land.To wit, they cram us into tiny 100x40 rabbit holes or smaller...all the while securing acres of usable land for themselves.In order to justify their behavior, they invent fictions such as "Manmade Global Warming"...but even the slowest reader is beginning to get it.
Oh boy. I don't even know where to start. Nah, nevermind, it's a waste of time.
Your profile name pretty much says it all, and mostly "Deny." I agree with Matt, that it's a tremendous waste of time to argue with the likes of you. If you're going to try a debate on this or any other topic, maybe write something, well, that actually contains an argument instead of convoluted generalizations.One thing I can say: it is pure folly to think that all "usable" land, as you say, should be used. Protecting forests is one of the best ways to protect ourselves, and ...read more
Let me guess their plan to restore forests that suffered from fire suppression would be not to set controlled fires, but to log the underbrush instead, right?Idiots.
We'll lay off the lawsuits when the government and timber industry stop logging old growth, stop clear cutting, stop logging after fires -- an extremely ecologically destructive practice! -- stop logging in threatened and endangered species habitat, stop using pesticides, stop building roads -- another very ecologically destructive practice, and stop all other harmful practices. We do not sue for fun, we sue to protect the Earth. If Vilsack is being honest and this ...read more