It's not a vacation, we swear!

Reps take expensive trip to learn about climate, but still block action 1

What’s missing from this Wall Street Journal article about expensive taxpayer-funded congressional travel to exotic locations?  The fact that seven of the 10 representatives who spent about half a million bucks to go see climate-change-addled penguins actually voted against the House bill that seeks address the concern.

Despite jetting to New Zealand and the South Pole to observe the impacts of climate change (in some cases, with spouses in tow), the following representatives voted against the Waxman-Markey climate and energy bill:

Bob Inglis (R-S.C.)
Frank Lucas (R-Okla.)
Charlie Melancon (D-La.)
Randy Neugebauer (R-Texas)
Mike Ross (D-Ark.)
Adrian Smith (R-Neb.)
John Tanner (D-Tenn.)

Kate Sheppard is Grist’s political reporter.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. steve b Posted 10:34 am
    11 Aug 2009

    $350/day "incidental" money? Trips to Paris and the Galapagos in the name of "public service"? Wives along? And STILL in denial?Is that why I pay taxes?

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement