Hop on the ban wagon

Disposable-bag restrictions around the U.S. and the world 4

Garden flamingos picking up a plastic bag.

Seattle voters will decide on Aug. 18 whether to impose a 20-cent fee on all paper and plastic bags from grocery, drug, and convenience stores.  But it’s not the first U.S. city to restrict disposable bags—nor even the first in Washington state.

In Edmonds, Wash., north of Seattle, the city council voted in late July to ban disposable plastic bags at retail outlets (excluding those used for produce and bulk foods). The ban will go into effect next year.

Even green-leaning western Washington is behind the times in comparison with San Francisco, which enacted the nation’s first ban on plastic bags at grocery and drug stores in 2007.  The city council in Oakland, Calif., also voted in 2007 to impose a ban on the bags, but the plastic-bag industry has tied the measure up in court.

Other bag-hostile California cities include Palo Alto, Calif., where a plastic-bag ban is set to go into effect this September, and Los Angeles, which will begin banning plastic bags in July 2010.

Maui, Hawaii, will start banning plastic bags in 2011. A smattering of other cities around the U.S. are also considering bans.

But on the global stage, plastic-bag restrictions are hardly new.

In 1989, Italy took a look around its beaches and saw plastic bags cluttering the scenery and choking dolphins. To help clear up the mess, the Italian government began taxing plastic bags, and next year it will institute an all-out ban on them.

After bag-clogged drains led to prolonged flooding in Dhaka, Bangladesh, in 1988 and 1998, the government banished disposable plastic bags from the city in 2002.

Lethal floods blamed on bag-clogged drains have also prompted a number of city and state governments in India to impose plastic-bag bans.

In 2002, Ireland became the first European nation to tackle the plastic-bag problem. It imposed a 15-cent PlasTax, revolutionizing the Irish shopping scene with reusable sacks and reducing the use of flimsy plastic ones by 90 percent within weeks.

In South Africa, plastic bags were such a ubiquitous scourge that they became known as the “national flower” until the nation banned them in 2003Eritrea, Rwanda, and Somalia followed suit in 2005, and Tanzania in 2006.

In Kenya, Nobel Peace Prize winner Wangari Mathaai blamed plastic bags for helping to spread malaria because discarded bags can fill with rainwater and become a breeding ground for mosquitoes. Her country banned thin plastic bags in 2007 and imposed fines on thicker ones. Uganda followed its lead.

In China, where up to 3 billion plastic bags were being used per day, the government in 2008 banned super-thin plastic bags and imposed fees on thicker ones.

South Australia hopped on the “ban” wagon this year, threatening fines of up to $5,000 for stores that don’t comply. The rest of Australia is considering a similar ban.

Find out more about bag bans around the world from Planet Ark, the BBC, and National Geographic News.

Vanessa Kerr is an editorial intern at Grist.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. Eeli Posted 1:33 pm
    07 Aug 2009

    It is amazing that, even on a world wide scale, people fail to look at the facts.  http://www.iowaenvironmentallawupdate.com/2009/07/articles/going-green/sure-plastic-bags-are-better-but-is-that-the-real-question/
  2. jochen Posted 1:48 pm
    09 Aug 2009

    The article EELI linked to is misleading, at least until the end. Its thrust for nearly the entirety of the article is that the alternative to not using plastic bags is using paper bags, a stance I am positive that no environmental organization would take; of course they know the comparable stats, and it is (very) old news that paper does not degrade in a landfill. Rather, the idea behind these laws, and the hope of environmental organizations and recycling advocates is that people will use reusable cloth (or some type of reused fiber product, ie plastic bottles) bags. As the linked article finally gets around to pointing out, the thinking should be along the lines of diminishing the waste stream; getting rid of plastic bags and using reusable bags does just that. It also forces the issue into the general public's mind, causing them to rethink whether they actually need that bag in the first place; think of how many times the clerk has offered to bag the item that could fit in your pocket, purse, handbag or backpack. (Not to mention the ubiquitous [and completely unnecessary] double-bagging that is constantly done, without asking, in most grocery stores.)
  3. jdevine Posted 7:31 am
    10 Aug 2009

    Thanks for the round-up.  I noticed one omission: here in D.C., we're among the leaders on this issue.  Thanks to a bill that recently passed the D.C. Council unanimously and was signed by the Mayor, we'll soon be reducing our use of non-recyclable bags, while using funds generated from a small charge on the bags that are distributed to help clean up the beleaguered Anacostia River.
  4. Eeli Posted 8:17 am
    11 Aug 2009

    Jochen,  The link I used pointed out that AS BETWEEN PLASTIC BAGS AND PAPER BAGS, PLASTIC BAGS ARE THE BETTER ENVIRONMENTAL CHOICE.  I take it from your comment that you understand that but, believe it or not, many people are unaware of that fact.  Some people even continue to believe that a prime reason to get rid of plastic bags is the detrimental affect they have on wildlife (not true according to Greenpeace).  For this reason, banning plastic bags, while allowing paper bags as the only solution, is backwards.  My comment addressed the topic of the article (banning plastic bags).  There wasn't even a mention of reusable bags in the article.  Your comment, simplistic as it was, chose to go off on a tangent not addressed in the original post or in my comment.  That's your choice, but don't call my comment misleading just because you want to go off on tangents.As to reusable bags, of course they're better than disposable paper or plastic, but what is your proposal to get the average consumer there? That's the hard question that you simply ignored.  How about  http://www.iowaenvironmentallawupdate.com/2009/07/articles/going-green/the-grocery-bag-dilemma-some-suggested-solutions/ or http://climateprogress.org/2009/07/29/paper-or-plastic-bag/ as a starting point?  

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement