The House Doctors Are In

Symptom: High utility bills; Diagnosis: Full energy efficiency workup 4

home energy auditsPhoto illustration by Tom Twigg / Grist

The red Honda Fit from a local car-sharing service pulls into the driveway of a suburban San Francisco Bay-area home, and two clean-cut young guys in khaki jump out and start unloading a Ghostbusters array of gadgets —something resembling a giant black megaphone, a glowing tube attached to a video screen, and a handheld device that looks like it was pilfered from Dr. McCoy’s sick bay.

Meet the “greenup” team from Sustainable Spaces, a four-year-old San Francisco firm that conducts residential energy audits and energy efficiency retrofits to shrink a home’s carbon footprint while saving the owner money over the long haul.

Sustainable Spaces Matt GoldenMatt Golden of Sustainable Spaces sets up a large fan inside the home’s front door. When the fan is turned on, the house will be pressurized and the team will measure where the air is leaking out.KQED Quest via FlickrGreen retrofits are all the rage and for a reason: commercial and residential buildings account for more than 40 percent of greenhouse gas emissions in the United States. Insulating homes, plugging leaky heating ducts and taking other low-tech measures could cut energy use appreciably, which is why the Obama administration wants to retrofit all 128 million U.S. homes and has devoted billions of stimulus package cash to weatherization and other energy efficiency programs.

So what has largely been an unregulated mom-and-pop business needs to scale up—big time—and homeowners need incentives to invest in insulation and other unglamorous improvements. Sustainable Spaces’ solution: Silicon Valley-style technological innovation coupled with heavy-duty politicking in Washington. More on that later.

At the 1950s ranch house in the East Bay ‘burb of Walnut Creek, energy auditor Ryan Jaramillo is explaining to homeowner Dan Schoenholz the company’s holistic home approach that treats a house as a networked energy system so that solutions can be prioritized to get the most bang for the buck. About half of greenups—Sustainable Spaces slang for energy audits—result in retrofits, Jaramillo says, and the company itself performs 90 percent of that work.

The 40-something, Prius-driving Shoenholz is a prototypical green retrofit client.  He already had replaced many of his old single-pane windows. And Shoenholz, who deals with energy efficiency programs as a special projects manager for an East Bay city, rarely runs his air conditioner, even in Walnut Creek’s sweltering summers. He even participates in a PG&E program that lets the utility remotely turn off the AC when electricity demand spikes.

And he was willing to shell out about $300 for a Sustainable Spaces greenup, which usually runs $595 for a comparably sized house.

While Jaramillo strapped on a face mask and hoisted himself into the attic to inspect the ductwork and insulation, a colleague began measuring each room in the house, noting the placement of heating vents while using a gadget to determine the energy efficiency of the windows. Jaramillo then donned a jumpsuit and crawled into the crawl space, poking a gadget into the woodwork that measures moisture content.

Back in the house, Jaramillo fed a cable containing a miniature camera into the walls to see if they were insulated. Then it was time for the blower test. The front door was sealed and a blower used to depressurize the house so the greenup team could identify air leaks. Waving around an infrared sensor device, Jaramillo could see heat leaks showing up on the screen as orange-red sunbursts.

All the data collected at Schoenholz’s home will be fed into Sustainable Space’s computer models to guide its engineers’ design of an energy efficiency plan.

“One of the things that has prevented me from doing this stuff is that there’s a huge capital investment for a relatively small return,” Schoenholz says, “though I know it’s the right thing to do.”

The relatively paltry tax incentives for energy efficiency retrofits is the reason Sustainable Spaces founder and president Matt Golden spends at least one week a month in Washington. “We really didn’t get our act together for the stimulus and we kind of missed that boat to some degree,” Golden tells me a few days later in San Francisco. “Sexiness-wise, we don’t sound byte and we don’t have a pretty picture of a solar panel.”

While many billions will be handed out to weatherize low-income housing and promote other energy efficiency measures, not much was put in the pot for the average middle-class homeowner—Sustainable Spaces’ bread and butter customers. Install a $30,000 solar array on your roof and you qualify for a 30 percent tax credit—$9,000. But spend $30,000 on maximizing your home’s energy efficiency and the credit tops out at $1,500.

Golden, who serves as president of the new home-retrofit trade group Efficiency First, has been lobbying Congress to make tax credits dependent on how much energy a retrofit saves, not on the price of the products installed. Efficiency First also wants federal loan guarantees and low-interest financing for home retrofits. Golden is also working with state and local officials on how stimulus money will be distributed and for what programs.

Sustainable SpacesPam Molsick of Sustainable Spaces inspects heating ducts insulated with asbestos, which is badly peeling in places.KQED Quest via FlickrBut Golden is depending on technological innovation to transform a cottage industry into big business. Sustainable Spaces, for instance, has an eight-person software division developing programs to automate the energy audit and retrofit process. (The company’s VP of product development is a former Google engineering director.)

“We’re building a system that gives customers access to the data the same way we access the data, accelerates the process and also deploys systems on handhelds out in the field,” says Golden. “Very rapidly we need to deliver the tools that enable scale in this industry—through whatever means necessary because that’s how we get to our climate goals.”

And Efficiency First is pushing government to regulate the retrofit industry to avoid a backlash if unscrupulous operators flood the field in search of quick cash. “There’s more stringent standards in California for cutting hair than doing an energy audit,” Golden says.

Which is why I wasn’t surprised the other day when I was walking to the Berkeley farmers market to find a person handing out flyers for—you guessed it—home energy audits.

Read past Green State installments by Todd Woody.

Todd Woody covers green technology and the environment from Berkeley, where he’s a contributing editor at Fortune Magazine and writes his Green Wombat blog. He’s one of the few people on the planet who has seen the rare northern hairy-nosed wombat in the wild.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. Chris Pratt Posted 9:42 am
    19 Jun 2009

    Mr Shoenholz has his heart in the right place, but that huge capital investment turns out not to be very sustainable in the long and short run.  I do analysis on windows and have found that people in the San Fransisco area should not  replace their single pane double windows with thermal pane double hungs, new or replacement tilt packs.  You should upgrade the windows with state of the art weather sealing to reduce the infiltratation of cold air, but the energy cost of replacing the whole window and throwing out the old window to get an extra 2 R-value in a climate like San Francisco just doesn't add up.  If you are a die hard enviro, get a good storm window and a nice wool hat.  Remember there is a lot of embedded carbon costs in the old window that is lost and a lot of embedded carbon cost in the new windows, which by the way only have a life time guareentee of 25 years by which time the plastic slides will have worn out and you will need a replacement again, or the thermal pane seal will have broken and they will be fogged.  If you shelled out the big bucks for a wood window, which is a good choice, chances are the wood is pine and inferior to the fir that make up most of the older windows.  If you think the payback on the windows is 75 or 100 years, what are the chances that a flying object will break the glass sometime in that interval.   Have you every tried to get someone to replace the thermal pane in your windows without replacing the whole window?  When new window are things that can be repaired easily by local contractors from materials that can be purchased at local hardware storees then you have something that will last a life time and is sustainable.
  2. solargroupies's avatar

    solargroupies Posted 1:04 pm
    19 Jun 2009

    Chris has a good point. Even in a temperate climate on the 45th parallel like those of us on the Canadian border, old wood frame single panes with aluminum frame storm windows still get enough of the job done to not warrant replacing for the heat loss at todays heating costs. What's missing from the equation? Your title: High Utility bills.
  3. solar greg Posted 7:20 am
    24 Jun 2009

    We install solar heaters and have found that one of the things that wastes a lot of energy in the kitchen is the faucet. It seems to be very popular to use the single valve comand. When it opens in the center position, it uses half cold and half hot. Whether you need warm water or not. Because of the way water is used in kitchens, little bits at a time, the heat is lost in the tubing. 
  4. carlos.rymer Posted 12:16 pm
    26 Jun 2009

    Learn how to GoGreen with Green Irene, the only national home eco-consulting firm. Green Irene's flagship Green Home Makeover can help you not just cut your footprint, but also save money at the same time. To learn more about us, visit us at http://www.GreenIrene.com!

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement