West Virginia gets more of its electricity from coal than any other state. To celebrate that fact, yesterday WV Gov. Joe Manchin (D) declared coal the official state rock.
Yes, really. Coal is now the state rock of West Virginia.
But why should Manchin stop there? Having a coal-based economy has given his state so many other reasons to celebrate!
For instance, West Virginia has the lowest median household income in the U.S., and offers the least low-income weatherization assistance of any state, so perhaps Manchin could declare Sweltering in a Shack the official state pastime.
WV has the most casual and heavy drinkers, so it only makes sense to declare bourbon the official state beverage. [Gah! Mountain Mama is right in comments—I completely misread this chart. WV has the fewest drinkers.]
Manchin’s state comes in dead last in educational services and social assistance, but leads in citizens with disabilities, which suggests an official state motto: You’re On Your Own. And with the lowest number of college graduates of any state, and among the lowest adult literacy rates, WV definitely needs a short motto.
The state is winning the race in tooth loss and obesity, so it’s a no-brainer for Manchin to declare milkshakes the official state dessert.
You might think all this coal-economy goodness would drive West Virginians a little crazy, but with the lowest expenditures in any state on mental health services, let’s hope not!
Yes, the coal economy has been very good to West Virginia. Yay for coal!
Comments
View as Flat
veritone Posted 2:01 pm
04 Jun 2009
Permalink
mmooney Posted 4:11 pm
04 Jun 2009
WV = Coal
WV = Dumb, poor, drunk, fat and handicapped
Therefore
Coal = Dumb, poor, drunk, fat and handicappedFor some less funny (Debbie Downer-ish) stuff:
While I admittedly am not an expert on the subject, I feel as though we can't entirely fault the West Virginia political powers-that-be for trying to protect what contribution they do make the American economy and keep their maligned state financially afloat. Granted, they aren't exactly lighting the world on fire researching alternatives (carbon sequestration = still-dirty path of least resistance), but I have yet to come across a compelling economic proposal for the state that would compensate for such a devastating loss as wiping out WV coal (I welcome any information informing me otherwise).
Immediately mining all coal out of West Virginia's economy would be a domestic first cousin of Bush/Cheney Iraqi policy: Upend the only semblance of economic stability, declare victory in the name of the Earth, and see ya!!
I realize that's not being called for explicitly, but pursuing that thought further (for the sake of argument) leads to a disturbing conundrum: Is the climate situation in such dire straights (or will it soon be) that it requires plunging our own citizens into the relative depths of poverty (even temporarily) for the sake of long-term preservation? If so, then WV would be the first domestic case of the choice that other developing nations face in the name of climate change.
At its core, the climate crisis is economic based, both in its cause and in its potential solution(s). We may soon see if it either results in a global redistribution of wealth (see Brazil: cash for trees) or developed nations choose a hot and watery grave rather than give up their Hummers.
Permalink
David Roberts Posted 7:59 pm
04 Jun 2009
Permalink
Mountain Mama Posted 10:33 pm
04 Jun 2009
Permalink
David Roberts Posted 11:23 pm
04 Jun 2009
Permalink
Mountain Mama Posted 1:33 pm
06 Jun 2009
Thanks for changing the drinking statistic! And I appreciate the Democracy Now video though I think a compromise including (but not limited to) a ban on mountaintop removal is in order.
I'd like to take issue with a few other statistics - and the generation of such flawed statistics in the first place. I think MOUNTAINMAID captured quite well the destructive implications of drawing on these statistics. My personal take is that statistics like these are developed and propagated with a wealthy, hyper-educated (though not necessarily grounded in reality), URBAN bias. This bias presents itself in vocabulary of the statistics and the implicit assumptions subconscious or otherwise of those who create them.
To clarify my point about the social assistance expenditures (in my last post) -- the data source you reference ranks states based upon the expenditure of the state on social assistance in the year 2003 compared to expenditures in 2000. It says nothing of the absolute percentage of people benefiting from social programs or the types of programs that are represented in this statistic. An example of this latter point relates to another statistic you reference - "low-income weatherization assistance" -- where your source of information reports that WV spent "$0" in the year this data was collected yet you can read all about the current programs here:
http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/weatherization/state_activities_detail.cfm/state_abbr=wv
This reminds me about a conversation I had recently when West Virginia was ranked last on a national poll of "bicycle friendly states." I, then thought of other states in Appalachia -- and recalled that while Kentucky and your home state of Tennessee share WV's mountains, they have lots of flat land, too, as well as large urban areas. Same with North Carolina, Pennsylvania, etc. West Virginia is the only state entirely within the Appalachian region according to the Appalachian Regional Commission. This, in part, is why the coal lobby is so strong in West Virginia.
To complement West Virginia's natural beauty are many deeply rooted, beautiful people -- with diverse perspectives, strong kinship ties, and wisdom unadulterateded by the socialization of college.
Permalink
mmooney Posted 6:48 am
05 Jun 2009
Permalink
Pomelo Posted 5:22 am
05 Jun 2009
Permalink
mwildfire Posted 6:47 am
05 Jun 2009
Permalink
NightHawk22204 Posted 7:18 am
05 Jun 2009
Permalink
mountainmaid Posted 12:56 pm
06 Jun 2009
Permalink
appalachiantransplant Posted 9:38 am
07 Jun 2009
Permalink
randino Posted 5:58 pm
06 Jun 2009
Permalink
mwildfire Posted 5:33 am
07 Jun 2009
Permalink
appalachiantransplant Posted 9:27 am
07 Jun 2009
Permalink
mountainmaid Posted 11:06 am
08 Jun 2009
Permalink
appalachiantransplant Posted 6:47 pm
08 Jun 2009
Permalink
BobKincaid Posted 2:39 pm
07 Jun 2009
So the next time you have a giggle about us toothless hillbillies, do so in the full knowledge that we're toothless in part because the not-quite-as-American-as-you resource colony known as Appalachia has been exploited for the sake of "cheap" electricity for the rest of the U.S.
Permalink
Tyler Durden Posted 9:53 pm
07 Jun 2009
Permalink
wvrust Posted 7:01 am
15 Jun 2009
Permalink
BobKincaid Posted 7:17 am
15 Jun 2009
Permalink
mwildfire Posted 4:52 am
08 Jun 2009
Permalink
Alida Antonia Cornelius Posted 9:06 am
09 Jun 2009
But, I would rather have coal than nukes, but I sure wish they would finish that scrubber.
Permalink
wvrust Posted 9:49 am
15 Jun 2009
Permalink
BobKincaid Posted 11:39 am
15 Jun 2009
Permalink
BobKincaid Posted 11:39 am
15 Jun 2009
Permalink
wvrust Posted 4:38 pm
15 Jun 2009
Permalink