Swine flew

A terrific NYT piece on Smithfield and the globalization of pork 3

On Wednesday, The New York Times ran a terrific, long article—one that reporters had clearly worked on for a long time—on Smithfield Foods’ rapid transformation of hog farming in Eastern Europe.

The article documents how the Virginia-based pork giant has squashed small-scale hog farming in Romania and Poland, just as it did in the United States in the 1990s.

In Romania, the number of hog farmers has declined 90 percent - to 52,100 in 2007 from 477,030 in 2003 - according to European Union statistics, with ex-farmers, overwhelmed by Smithfield’s lower prices, often emigrating or shifting to construction. In their place, the company employs or contracts with about 900 people and buys grain from about 100 farmers.

In Poland, there were 1.1 million hog farmers in 1996. That number fell 56 percent by 2008, as the advent of modern farming methods transformed agriculture, according to the Polish National Agricultural Chamber.

It shows how the company behaved questionably during an outbreak of, ahem, swine flu (a “classic” strain that doesn’t affect humans) in Romania in 2007:

It moved [into Romania] with such speed that sometimes it failed to secure environmental permits or inform the authorities about pig deaths - lapses that emerged after swine fever swept through three Romanian hog compounds in 2007, two of which were operating without permits. Some 67,000 hogs died or were destroyed, with infected and healthy pigs shot to stanch the spread.

And the Times piece reveals how the pork giant used high-level cronyism to move through the maze of the Romanian political system:

In the post-Communist disorder, it is essential to know your way about. In Bucharest, Smithfield turned to Nicholas Taubman, a wealthy Republican businessman who was the U.S. ambassador to Romania during the administration of President George W. Bush. Mr. Taubman escorted Smithfield’s top executives during meetings with the Romanian president and prime minister and president.

“I’m from Virginia and they’re a large corporation and I know them very well,” Mr. Taubman said, noting that he had also helped Ford Motor, which had an easier time in Romania because it had the support of a government minister.

The article shows how Smithfield is managing to grab all manner of subsidies from the EU for, essentially, wiping out the small-farm sector in Poland and Romania. And there are the tales, familiar everywhere that Smithfield alights (Iowa, North Carlina, Vera Cruz, Mexico), of vast open cesspools, unbearable stenches, and wrecked communities. The article ends with a look at how cheap, subsidized Smithfield pork is streaming into Africa, undercutting farmers there and knocking them off the land.

Mr. Yao said that many pig farmers have left, in search of work. Like Romanian ex-farmers combing Europe’s construction sites for work, he is considering becoming an export himself.

Altogether, a tour de force on the real meaning of globalized, unregulated food markets—and an example of what good journalists can do with time and resources.

Grist food editor Tom Philpott farms and cooks at Maverick Farms, a sustainable-agriculture nonprofit and small farm in the Blue Ridge Mountains of North Carolina. Follow my Twitter feed; contact me at tphilpott[at]grist[dot]org.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. amazingdrx Posted 10:19 pm
    06 May 2009

    There it is, the patern is complete.  But what solution is right?Biodigesting the waste stream, turning all that disease breeding open waste into safely processed clean energy backup power (for wind/solar) via the smart grid.  With GHG canceling organic fertilizer as a valuable byproduct.Animals ought to be raised in clean, humane circumstances with waste removed to biodigestors ASAP.  It is being done sporadically all over the world.  The important thing to take away from this.  Organic agriculture/biogas energy yields GHG free energy and a safe food chain.  Free from dangerous chemical compounds and diseases.CAFO needs to go, to yield to local organic lower intensity agriculture, with people relying on more vegetable protien.  meat consumption cut by 75% would be a good long term goal.
  2. enviroperk Posted 12:33 pm
    07 May 2009

    Hi Tom,I am breaking a promise to a special someone to never post about swine again.  So this question is really about productivity.This IS a good article, but it has some information that I am unable to comprehend: "... number of hog farmers has declined 90 percent — to 52,100 in 2007 from 477,030 in 2003. In their place, the company employs or contracts with about 900 people". Is this implying that Smithfield can produce the same number of hogs with 900 people that previously took  424,930 hog farmers (477,030 - 52,100)? Really, 900 people have the same output as 424,000 previously?  
  3. Erik Hoffner's avatar

    Erik Hoffner Posted 2:23 pm
    07 May 2009

    Good to hear of this piece. It mirrors closely what I heard in Poland this fall when I was there covering a story on the plight of small farmers and how they're turning to heritage breeds to go in the opposite direction of the homogenizing/enormousizing influence of outfits like Smithfield that have moved in. There's no question of competing withthese megafarms, it's just a question of survival at this point.Have a look here at one of the heritage breeds the farmers are turning to, thanks to the Heifer Project:http://erikhoffner.com/gallery3.htmlThe Zlotnickia Biale sow in the top left corner is renowned for her DISEASE RESISTANCE as well as being easy to care for. Click on her image to enlarge.I think she's pretty gorgeous.Erik, Orion Grassroots Network

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement