Vague intentions

U.S. pledges something or other on climate 1

Out-of-focus campfireDetails aren’t in focus in this climate doc.Photo: circulating via FlickrToday U.S. negotiators promised “ambitious actions,” “robust targets,” and pretty much nada details in a proposal overdue to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.

The paper suggests a structure for the international climate treaty to be hashed out in Copenhagen this December—something the UNFCC had requested from participating nations by April 24, a deadline many countries missed.

“The United States supports a Copenhagen agreed outcome that recognizes the magnitude and seriousness of what science demands … is pragmatic, and recognizes the diversity of countries’ circumstances and opportunities,” the proposal said.

In the Financing section, the U.S. acknowledged public and private cash will be required to help developing nations deal with floods and other effects of climate change.

“The U.S. is keenly aware of the need for a dramatic increase in the flow of resources available to developing countries to catalyze both mitigation and adaptation actions at a scale that will be necessary to address the climate challenge,” it said.

The paper also suggests countries should set mid-term emissions reductions targets for 2020 and long-term targets for 2050. Beyond that, the proposal is vague, which seems to be what the UNFCCC called for at this stage. It abounds with bracketed provisions to be filled in later, as in:

[provisions to enable transparency and appropriate participation of the Parties]

And:

Having a shared vision of [summary that ties together the elements of the agreement],

If I have one scintillating, profound observation to add, it’s that [awesome observation that ties together the whole post].

Care to read the proposal yourself? Have at it [PDF].

Jonathan Hiskes is a Grist staff writer. He reports, tweets, eats, asks questions, self-promotes, looks out windows, and wonders if it could be like this.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. Delay And Deny's avatar

    Delay And Deny Posted 12:09 am
    06 May 2009

    It's really the developed countries that need a "flow of funds".   Let's be plain.  We've got to dig our way out of the tangled nest we've built for ourselves.   We live on top of each other using 19th infrastructure that has to be layered on to make it "more efficient".   Far better to abandon the cities and head into the interior.   Far better to convert everything to Hydrogen fuel like Norway is testing with the Mazda RX-8 powered by Hydrogen. http://www.wired.com/autopia/2009/04/mazda-sends-hydrogen-rx-8s-to-norway/Investment is stagnant right now...and its not the Government's fault.  They've loaded up banks to the coffers with freshly printed Bennies.   Now the investors have to live up to the reputation we've built about private enterprise.  We need the risk takers, the individuals, the scientists and the executives to leave the old behind and invest and built the new.   A single government edict or plan is simply not enough.   The soda machine isn't working anymore, and people know it.   We need to build hundreds of new soda machines and while we're at it, fill them up with fresh juice that is fructose free. 

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement