The bill formerly known as ...

Washington’s cap-and-trade legislation no longer involves cap and trade 0

Prince posterPhoto: libraryman via FlickrWashington state’s cap-and-trade legislation is no more.

Or rather, it IS ... in the existential sense ... but after the House passed a watered down version on Wednesday, it should no longer be allowed to call itself “cap-and-trade legislation.” As there is no cap and trade in said cap-and-trade legislation. There is cap (Washington’s only coal-fired power plant will be required to halve greenhouse-gas emissions by 2025), but there is no trade, and there is certainly no cap-and-trade.

In fact, I suggest this so-called “cap-and-trade legislation” pull a Prince and henceforth refer to itself only as The Bill Formerly Known as Cap-and-Trade.

So what does TBFKACAT call for? Well, it tells the state to “work with the Western Climate Initiative” on any federal actions and tells the Department of Ecology to “work with polluters” to devise a way to reduce harmful emissions. I’m sure that’ll all “work out” peachily.

Sarah van Schagen is Grist’s Seattle editor.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement