A Smug's Life

Earth Day: the ultimate empty gesture 6

Dan AkstDan AkstThank God for Earth Day: another occasion for affluent white Americans to feel good about themselves by enacting some pointless environmental ritual. Perhaps we can all drive to the festivities in our hulking SUVs.

Can you blame me for being cynical? Every dinner party I attend is marked by pious denunciations of greed and excess, yet all the guests have multiple cars, multiple homes, and a tendency to break out in hives if they don’t take a planet-warming plane flight once a month or so.

Recently an acquaintance of mine, at such a gathering, condemned the horrors of Hummers—then brightened when she had the chance to tell us about the major addition she was about to tack onto her house, the better for her tiny family to rattle around in. I was at another dinner party where the hosts, who also hold all the right environmental views, both work more than 100 miles from home. And “home” is a fashionably old farmhouse that appears to be devoid of insulation.

My kids’ school is “going green.” So far, this seems to mean requiring pupils to buy a metal water bottle—just the sort of fetish-object we environmentalists love. But despite a student body distributed over a vast area, there is no organized attempt to carpool. During spring break, moreover, the school’s well-to-do families fly hither and yon, or drive to the ski slopes, or shuttle between their houses. Some of the cars still display their Obama bumper stickers, cherished amulets against reproach.

Who are we kidding? Well-intentioned people everywhere lament global warming, but few of us care enough to take even the most reasonable basic steps to make a change. We salve our conscience by recycling cans or buying locally grown rutabagas, as if such nonsense matters when set against our own—and our country’s—gigantic fossil footprint.

There are, of course, those who don’t believe in man-made global warming, or don’t consider it a big deal compared to malnutrition, disease and other Third World maladies. I think these people are mostly wrong, but at least they aren’t hypocrites. Before we can expect the skeptics to change, it might be nice if we set a better example. And if you’re about to protest that you already live in a yurt, save your breath. This isn’t about you. It’s about the rest of us—and I count myself foursquare among them—who tut-tut and wring our hands and then drive home, content in our sanctimony.

One way to change that is to do something that actually matters this Earth Day. First, figure out your own carbon footprint (several websites will do this for you) and see how you stack up against the national average, which of course is way too high anyway. Then set a reasonable goal for reduction and publicly commit to it—at your next dinner party, for example.

Do not pretend you’re going to bicycle everywhere, or that it’s somehow smart or ethical to spend $50,000 to cut your electric bill by 20 percent. On the contrary, first do what yields the biggest reduction for the smallest pain—and measure the results to see how you’re doing. You could give up beef, for instance. Fly less. Change your bulbs and plug the holes in your house. Buy stuff used. These modest sacrifices will have a much bigger impact than obsessing over where your eggplants come from. You can go up the scale from there, perhaps by considering an on-demand hot water system. The idea is continuous, sensible improvement; at our house we use a ten-year payback metric. If a measure won’t repay its cost, then there’s probably a better way to spend the money to save the earth.

At the same time, let’s acknowledge the limits of caulk guns and compact fluorescents—to say nothing of the Kyoto accord. To make a real domestic difference—of the kind that could help us make a difference on the world stage—will take political action. Thus it’s probably better to invest in political candidates than solar panels.

We seem to have forgotten that sometimes we need government to protect us from ourselves. Often it guards against the wrong harms (as with Prohibition or the war on drugs). But not always. Long ago, in a time of crisis, we agreed to tax ourselves to guard against destitution in retirement, and the voters still strongly support Social Security. Perhaps this time around we can find the will to tax ourselves (and our carbon use) to guard against environmental destitution. Then we can safely ignore Earth Day, smug in the knowledge that we aren’t the sort of people who are satisfied with empty gestures.

 

 

Daniel Akst is a writer in New York’s Hudson Valley, where he’s working on a book about the problem of self-control.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. Stephanie Ogburn's avatar

    Stephanie Ogburn Posted 4:40 pm
    15 Apr 2009

    This is an awesome essay and a stirring call for civic engagement. Right on. However, I don't think we need to get rid of Earth Day. Sometimes symbolic activities provide an entry point for people on the edges of a movement, and an opportunity for education that can also lead to awareness and political engagement. So while I agree that yuppy versions of going green are frequently lame, I also think it's difficult for everyone to become politically engaged right off the bat, and offering people other ways of getting involved (like starting a garden, or cleaning up a riverside park on Earth Day) is an important way to start the learning process and also build the community connections necessary for making progress on the important issues of our time.
  2. GreendesignerWestSac Posted 12:12 am
    16 Apr 2009

    Hmmm... while I can definitely see why you feel as cynical on this topic as you do (and in fact I largely concur) I have to say that Stephanie's also correct: most folks do need some sort of entry-point to go from a sort of amorphous general sticky feeling of goodwill-to-the-planet to more targeted, specifically-helpful things, especially when realistically, we're asking them to make some real lifestyle changes.For purposes of transparency and full disclosure: though I don't live in a yurt, I DO live in a 1200 sq ft New Urbanist home in West Sacramento which beats California's Title 24 energy-efficiency standards by ~ 40%, uses a bevy of green building strategies and materials, and is part of a LEED ND development... (look up LJUrban's Good project to see pictures) and I ride a motorcycle to work a lot of the time due to the fuel efficiency (and 'cos it's fun - green can be *cool* too) and often bicycle. I organize carpools for my work as part of our local TMA... and there are more and more people in their 20's and 30's just like me making smaller-living choices all the time - this is perhaps one of those societal-level shifts that will be largely generational - I'm not certain, but I suspect this is so. I have hope. 
  3. everquestforgreen Posted 11:24 am
    16 Apr 2009

    Great article(cynicism works in an article title!). It seems to me that you have two choices.1. Change friends since the ones you have seem to be hypocrites who only pay lip service about environmental issues to look good at dinner parties.2. Change your attitude towards your friend's hypocritical views and accept the fact that trying to be greener is OK and being reminded that we are all hypocrites with Earth Day serves a purpose.   

    Earth Day maybe about being greener and starting somewhere.
  4. Ben Jervey Posted 8:20 am
    17 Apr 2009

    Amen!  So well put!
    Last year, I wrote something attacking the "save the planet" Earth Day rhetoric, but the absurd behavior we engage in to "celebrate" the environment needs just this sort of lambasting.  
  5. spector70's avatar

    spector70 Posted 9:14 am
    17 Apr 2009

    I walk nearly everywhere that I go, I do my best to reduce, reuse,
    and recycle.  I really think that this "Screw Earth Day" is a very
    arrogant, lousy way to get a message across.  I do my best every day. 
    I walk to work, to the grocery store, to pay bills, nearly everywhere. 
    The christians have their Easter, let me have my one, single holiday -
    Earth Day. Before you place yourself too high on a pedestal, remember that
    fires start with a spark.  Give people Earth Day and hopefully the
    spark of environmentalism will ignite. Happy Earth Day.
  6. wallrock's avatar

    wallrock Posted 10:34 am
    22 Apr 2009

    Wait a minute - in one paragraph Akst is saying that recycled cans and local rutabagas are "nonsense" with respect to the real concern, our carbon footprint.  But it's perfectly acceptable to start with modest energy-saving measures like CFLs and weatherizing, so long as it leads to long-term change.  So what, locally-sourced produce and recycling don't reduce carbon emissions or lead to long-term change now?  Come off of it.  Akst claims that Earth Day is an "empty gesture" because he knows of people that self-righteously claim eco-purity when in fact their not perfect.  Big surprise: people aren't perfect. 

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Series Intro
We need Earth Day more than ever 3
Earth Day: the ultimate empty gesture 6
Losing Earth Day in the eco-babble 3
Broadening the Earth Day tent 3
The business of Earth Day 6
Screw Earth Day? Not so fast 3
Advertisement