Architect in chief

Obama calls renewables a ‘pillar’ of new economy 5

Obama at GeorgetownCourtesy of Georgetown UniversityPresident Obama today affirmed the place of renewable energy as one of the “five pillars” upon which he plans to build an economic recovery.

In a speech at Georgetown University in Washington, D.C., Obama warned Americans to expect more economic pain and a long road to recovery. He then sketched out his pillars for economic growth: new regulation of the financial markets, investments in education to strengthen the workforce, renewable energy, reducing health care costs, and shrinking the federal debt.

Here’s the section on renewable energy and efficiency:

Now, the third pillar of this new foundation is to harness the renewable energy that can create millions of new jobs and new industries. We all know that the country that harnesses this new energy source will lead the 21st century. Yet we’ve allowed other countries to outpace us on this race to the future.

I don’t know about you, but I do not accept a future where the jobs and industries of tomorrow take root beyond our borders. I think it’s time for America to lead again. So the investments we made in the Recovery Act will double this nation’s supply of renewable energy in the next three years.

And we are—(applause)—and we are putting Americans to work making our homes and buildings more efficient, so that we can save billions on our energy bills and grow our economy at the same time.

Now, the only way, though, that we can truly spark the transformation that’s needed is through a gradual, market-based cap on carbon pollution, so that clean energy is the profitable kind of energy. (Applause.)

There are those who’ve argued that we shouldn’t attempt, we shouldn’t even be thinking, we shouldn’t even be talking about such a transition until the economy recovers. And they are right that we have to take into account the costs of transition. Transitioning to a clean-energy economy will not be easy. But we can no longer delay putting a framework for a clean-energy economy in place. That needs to be done now. If businesses—(applause)—if businesses and entrepreneurs know today that we are closing this carbon pollution loophole, they’ll start investing in clean energy now. And pretty soon, we’ll see more companies constructing solar panels, and workers building wind turbines and car companies manufacturing fuel-efficient cars. Investors will put some money into a new energy technology, and a small business will open to start selling it. That’s how we can grow this economy, enhance our security and protect our planet at the same time.

Jonathan Hiskes is a Grist staff writer. He reports, tweets, eats, asks questions, self-promotes, looks out windows, and wonders if it could be like this.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. Christopher S. Johnson's avatar

    Christopher S. Johnson Posted 12:36 pm
    14 Apr 2009

    Oh no.  He didn't really say "five pillars" did he?  [smacks forehead]  Geeze Loueez where were his speech writers?  Can't wait for the Christian Right to get a hold of that!
    1. Jonathan Hiskes's avatar

      Jonathan Hiskes Posted 1:54 pm
      14 Apr 2009

      Straight outta the gospels no less. From the speech:There is a parable at the end of the Sermon on the Mount that tells the story of two men.  The first built his house on a pile of sand, and it was destroyed as soon as the storm hit.  But the second is known as the wise man, for when "…the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house…it fell not:  for it was founded upon a rock."

      We cannot rebuild this economy on the same pile of sand.  We must build our house upon a rock.  We must lay a new foundation for growth and prosperity – a foundation that will move us from an era of borrow and spend to one where we save and invest; where we consume less at home and send more exports abroad.

      It’s a foundation built upon five pillars that will grow our economy and make this new century another American century...
      1. Christopher S. Johnson's avatar

        Christopher S. Johnson Posted 2:35 pm
        14 Apr 2009

        That's lovely, really.  But its even better known as a reference to Islam.  Of course there is nothing wrong with that in the abstract, but after the misinformation campaign during the election, and the damage it caused, you'd think that Obama would avoid associations of America's goals with the tenets of Islam (even if it makes sense in the abstract).I'm pleasantly surprised to not see this association made on the front of the Drudge Report and the Christian Broadcasting Network.Whew!
  2. nixster Posted 3:08 pm
    14 Apr 2009

    Interesting posts. Does it ever occur that Obama could be as capable of utilizing coded language construction as his predecessor, but in a manner to inform and include some of the more than 50 million that didn't vote for him? Perhaps he's on to something.By the polls, it would appear that some of those "R" votes have now moved over to supporting the new president. Is this significant? Might explain some of the opposition staking such extreme opposition positions....
  3. wesrolley Posted 8:37 pm
    14 Apr 2009

    You heard a different speech than the one that Brian Williams reported on the Nightly News.  I guess we all lose a lot when we have to take the Readers Digest Encapsulated form.

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement