Support Grist
Support nonprofit, independent environmental journalism.
Donate to Grist.
'Tis the Season

Do You Really Want to Grill a Fish?

All you need for summer seafood splendor

By Roz Cummins
12 Jul 2007
Tools: print | email | discuss | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS
As you might imagine, people often ask me what species of fish are the best to eat in terms of environmental and health concerns. I usually respond by saying, "OK, how much free time do you have? Are you sitting down? Do you have access to the internet? Do you have a cold compress for your forehead? Are next-of-kin present and available to care for you if you keel over from information overload and/or frustration?"

Grills just wanna have fun.
Photo: iStockphoto
If the answer to all of the above questions is yes, then it's time to play "Do You Really Want to Grill a Fish? Are You Sure??"

It may seem like a game of luck and chance, but knowing a little bit about your subject -- including where to get reliable information -- can stack the cards in your favor.

After I get informed consent from the person who wants to know about fish, I explain that we have to consider three separate issues: Is it a fish that will survive the grilling process, or will it fall apart on the grill? (If it doesn't pass this test, there's no point going forward.) Is it safe to eat from a mercury/PCB/pollution perspective? Is it a good choice from an environmental standpoint, e.g., is it overfished? I'm assuming that if you're reading this article, that is an important consideration for you.

If you haven't given up on the whole idea after contemplating researching these three questions, here are some answers.

Fish that can deal with the grill


Some fish can be cut into steaks (i.e., cross-sections), such as tuna, salmon, mahi-mahi, and swordfish, and these are easy to cook directly on the grill. Swordfish, however, is a non-starter from both a health and environmental perspective, so that's out. The others have some limitations too -- more on that in a bit.

Fish that can be grilled in fillet form (i.e., length-wise sections) include trout, salmon, catfish, and red snapper -- but red snapper is another no-go on both counts, and some salmon should be avoided. By the way, using a "fish basket" can make cooking a fillet easier than cooking the fish directly on the grill itself.

Shrimp and scallops are a good choice for the grill, especially if you load several onto a skewer -- it's easier than turning them one at a time and reduces the chances of their slipping through the grill and being lost to the fire.

Some fish can also be cooked on a wooden plank, such as salmon. Not only does this make the fish easier to manipulate, but a plank made of alderwood or cedar can impart some of its flavor during the cooking process. Be sure to follow instructions for pre-soaking the plank -- and if you can, buy one that's certified as sustainably harvested.

If you don't have a grill, or just don't feel like cooking outdoors (if it's raining, say, or you get the itch to grill in the middle of winter) you can also use a grill pan, a heavy-duty frying pan with raised ridges that will lift the fish off the surface and leave grill marks. I recently bought a copy of Grill Pan Cookbook: Great Recipes for Stovetop Grilling; I haven't cooked out of it yet, so I can't offer an opinion on the recipes, but I noticed that it included recipes for tuna and salmon (as well as for many fish that are poor choices, environmentally speaking).

Health issues to consider


Packed with protein and generally heart-healthy, fish can be really good for you -- but if it's polluted, that same fish can be dangerous to consume. This is especially true for women of childbearing age, pregnant women, and children, as mercury and other contaminants can lead to birth defects and nerve damage.

The Oceans Alive website, a project of Environmental Defense, includes a useful list of health advisories that tells whether species are contaminated with PCBs, mercury, dioxin, and/or pesticides. It also lists how many meals per month one can safely eat of each fish depending upon whether one is a man, woman, or child. I have to say, I was quite shocked to see how many species -- including bluefish and striped bass -- clocked in at zero. It was very depressing, considering that I already had a pretty bleak view of things.

Many factors go into determining how each fish ranks. For example, the method of capture matters; some species are safer to eat if they are line-caught, because fish caught using lines tend to be younger and have had less time to accumulate mercury in their bodies than their older kin. It really pays to look up each species individually.

Of the fish I mentioned above that can stand up well on the grill, swordfish and red snapper should be avoided. Bluefin tuna and Atlantic salmon also don't make the cut. Mahi-mahi should be limited to no more than twice a month for young children, and three times a month for older children.

Which species are environmentally sound?


Still with us? Congratulations! You have made it to the third level! Now we can discuss fish that you can eat with the least impact on the environment.

This is actually an incredibly complex question, encompassing overfishing, habitat damage, aquaculture, bycatch, disease, pollution, and more. The answers can vary according to season, locality, and even whether scientists think they have a good handle on estimating the health of certain fish populations to begin with.

You can carry a wallet guide, which is handy but limited. For more information about a greater variety of species and subspecies, look at the longer lists available on the Monterey Bay Aquarium website in the Seafood Watch section and on the Oceans Alive website.

In fact, Oceans Alive provides a list that superimposes environmentally sound choices over the consumption advisories for different species.

Of the fish that swim to the top of these lists, some good choices for grilling are catfish, wild Alaskan salmon, and skipjack tuna from Hawaii or California. (Other species of tuna are not good choices for now.) Shrimp harvested in America and Canada are also an excellent choice, as are scallops.

The recipes


If you've made it this far and you still want to grill a fish, here are some great recipes.

Whenever I have a question about a grilling technique or want a recipe, I turn to the books by Chris Schlesinger and John Willoughby, such as License to Grill, The Thrill of the Grill, Let the Flames Begin, and Big Flavors of the Hot Sun. Their books on salads, pickles, and sides (Lettuce in Your Kitchen, Quick Pickles, and Salsas, Sambals, Chutneys, and Chow-Chows) are excellent as well, and their propensity for cringe-worthy puns would give the Grist staff a run for its money.

Thanks to Doe Coover for arranging permission to reprint the following recipes, which are both from The Thrill of the Grill: Techniques, Recipes, and Down-Home Barbecue; to Frances Kennedy for her work getting them to me, and to Chris and John for being so generous with their time and advice over the years.

Grilled Tuna Steak with Nectarine-Red Onion Relish
Serves 4 as a main course, medium-high "heat" (i.e., spiciness)

Four 8-10 ounce boneless tuna steaks, 1 inch thick
4 tablespoons salad oil
Salt and freshly ground pepper (white is best) to taste

Lightly rub the tuna steaks with oil and season with salt and pepper. Grill the tuna steaks 4-5 minutes per side over a medium-hot fire, being careful not to overcook them. Check for doneness by bending a steak gently and peering inside it, looking for a slight translucence in the center. Remove the steaks from the grill and place them on top of the relish.

Nectarine-Red Onion Relish
Makes about 3 cups

1 red bell pepper, seeded and cut into thin strips
6 ripe but firm nectarines, peeled and cut into 8 slices each*
1 medium red onion, sliced into long, thin pieces
1 teaspoon minced garlic
1/4 cup julienned fresh basil
1/4 cup red wine vinegar
1/4 cup fresh orange juice
2 tablespoons lime juice (about 1 lime)
1/4 cup virgin olive oil
Salt and freshly cracked black pepper to taste

Combine all the ingredients in a bowl and toss them gently. It works best if you use a stainless steel bowl much larger than you would think you would need for this recipe so you get some real mixing action as you toss. This will be a slightly runny relish, as the solids and liquids mix but do not combine. Keep chilled until ready to serve. This relish will keep, covered and refrigerated, up to 2 weeks.

*It's best to use fruit that is super-ripe, but if you use under-ripe fruit, add 1 teaspoon of sugar to compensate for the lack of sugar in the fruit.

Grilled Salmon Steak with Watercress, Ginger, and Sesame
Serves 4 as a main course, medium-high "heat" (i.e., spiciness)

Four 12-ounce salmon steaks (1 to 1-1/2 inches thick)
2 tablespoons peanut oil
Salt and freshly cracked black pepper to taste

2 bunches watercress, separated, washed, and dried
1/2 medium red onion, thinly sliced

For the vinaigrette:
2 tablespoons sesame oil
1 teaspoon sugar
2 tablespoons soy sauce
1 tablespoon minced fresh ginger
2 tablespoons rice vinegar
2 tablespoons red wine vinegar
1/4 cup olive oil
Salt and freshly cracked white pepper to taste

4 tablespoons sesame seeds, toasted in a single layer in a 350 degree oven for 25 minutes

Rub the salmon steaks on both sides with the peanut oil and sprinkle them with salt and pepper to taste. Over a medium-hot fire, grill the steaks 5 to 6 minutes per side. Remove them from the grill.

Meanwhile, in a salad bowl, combine the watercress and sliced onion. In another bowl, combine all the vinaigrette ingredients and mix well. Pour the vinaigrette onto the watercress-onion mixture and toss lightly.

Arrange the dressed watercress on a platter and place the salmon steaks on top. Sprinkle the steaks liberally with the toasted sesame seeds.

Tools: print | email | discuss | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS
Roz Cummins is a food writer who has worked in every possible permutation of food co-op, natural foods store, and granola-type restaurant. She lives in the greater Boston area and feels it is her mission to put the "eco" back in home economy.
< Previous | Next >
Comments: (22 comments)

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

Grilling Seafood

After all that, it's a bit disappointing you didn't specify which kind of fish in the recipes.

For instance, tuna. Some types of tuna are listed as "avoid" at Seafood Watch. And Oceans Alive has posted health alerts--especially for children--on tuna because of mercury.

What kind of salmon? Seafood Watch advises "avoid" not only Atlantic salmon but farmed chinook salmon. I wouldn't buy farmed salmon at all. The only choice remaining would be wild-caught salmon, and preferably Coho, Sockeye or King Salmon from Alaska.

You're right. It's a big headache.

The Slow Cook

something's fishy here!


The only thing that sounds good here is the Nectarine-Red Onion Relish!

Here's the "fish" section from my Eco-Eating web site at http://www.brook.com/veg - please take a look at it and let me/us know what you think:

Fish:                                          

            "Seafood is simply a socially acceptable form of bush meat", according to Paul Watson, a founder of Greenpeace and the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society. "We condemn Africans for hunting monkeys and mammalian and bird species from the jungle, yet the developed world thinks nothing of hauling in magnificent wild creatures like swordfish, tuna, halibut, shark and salmon for our meals. The fact is that the global slaughter of marine wildlife is simply the largest massacre of wildlife on the planet."

            Commercial fishing is causing the collapse of the world's fisheries, having likely passed "peak fish", destroying marine ecosystems, heavily polluting our oceans, and, along with climate change, contributing to "dead zones". In effect, we are clear cutting our underwater rainforests, including the coral reefs and mangroves that support a rich array of biodiversity, as well as providing coastal protection, leading to the endangerment and extinction of many species. To catch wild fish, entire schools of fish are netted along with turtles, dolphins, whales, sharks, seals, birds, and others as "by-catch", or "collateral damage", leaving a destructive and deadly wake. In fact, over 1/5 (about 22%) of fish caught by U.S. commercial operations is "by-catch" (fish that is caught, but discarded), topping more than a million tons per year.

            Aquaculture, or the factory farming of fish, is also massively eco-destructive, often leading to over-fishing of wild fish for feed, de-oxygenation of the water, disease amongst fish and other marine animals, and the (over)use of antibiotics, hormones, chemicals, and genetically-engineered additives.

            Further, underwater "forests" of coral reefs and mangroves are being decimated by "rape-and-run" shrimp farming (exploiting and polluting coastal communities for 2 to 5 years before abandoning them), commercial overfishing and trawling, inefficient industrial shipping, and other fish-related mega-activities with no regard for the natural world, whether underwater or above.

            Fish often contain mercury, arsenic, lead, cadmium as well as toxic POPs, including PCBs, DDT, and dioxin, which can't be removed from the fish and which bio-accumulate in consumers. "A major health hazard from eating fish flesh comes from humans causing polluted aquatic environments. Fish are repositories for the industrial and municipal wastes and the agricultural chemicals flushed into the world's waters", says Richard Schwartz, Ph.D. "Mercury, especially high in tuna and swordfish, can cause brain damage, especially in growing children. PCBs, dioxin, and pesticides (such as DDT) have been linked to cancers, nervous system disorders, fetal damage, and many other health problems. Removing fish from your meals eliminates half of all mercury exposure and reduces one's intake of other toxins." According to Dr. Steve Patch, co-director of the Environmental Quality Institute, University of North Carolina-Asheville, "We saw a direct relationship between people's mercury levels and the amount of... fish people consumed".

            While fish often seem to contain high levels of protein and healthy fats and fatty acids (especially for the fish), this may not be the case and, in any event, there are easy alternatives for these nutrients, including olives, flax, and hemp seeds. Additionally, fish, as with other animals, contain saturated fat and cholesterol, which are unhealthy. Further, fish do not contain any fiber, vitamins, anti-oxidants, or phytonutrients, all of which are exclusive to plant foods. A scientific review of studies about fish has shown that it is not necessarily a healthy food for humans.

            It is understandable why some people go into denial, but it should be clear that fish--as with all other animals--feel pain, a phenomenon in animals needed for survival and success. Being caught on a hook is "like dentistry without novocaine, drilling into exposed nerves" (Dr. Tom Hopkins). Being pulled out of the water is like a person being held under water.

            Vegetarians protect fish, other marine animals, and the incredible oceans they live in.

"Commercial fishing, aquaculture, and angling are environmentally catastrophic.... If you eat fish, you are supporting an industry that plunders our oceans with no regard for the horrible pain and suffering that fish and other marine animals endure or for the diverse ocean ecosystem that is imperative to the survival of all underwater life."

www.FishingHurts.com


Eco-Eating: Eating as if the Earth Matters at www.brook.com/veg

Fish and Bush Meat Are not the Same

As an aquatic scientist living in Alaska, I vehemently disagree with CyberBrook's sweeping generalizations about whether it's OK to eat fish.  I am not a vegetarian.  But neither do I think eating "bush meat" is a good thing, though I note most critics of this practice are not indigenous people looking for protein for their families in some of the world's most impoverished countries.

When you kill a chimpanzee or forest ungulate in the prime of its life, you destroy that individual's ability to propagate. However, when I eat a wild Alaska Sockeye, caught on its spawning run, I destroy only a single individual's reproductive potential out of a local spawning population of thousands of fish.  Since productivity in most rivers is limited by spawning habitat rather than spawning returns, as long as there are enough other adult Sockeye making it up the river, my harvest has no effect on productivity.  Alaska has a well-managed fishery and few if any obstacles to migration, unlike the N. Atlantic, site of first the Atlantic salmon crash (due in part to dams) and then the Cod and Haddock crash (due to overfishing) that occured while I was at a Nova Scotian grad school.

Maybe CyberBrook and other readers don't know this, but Pacific salmon die soon after spawning.  So the salmon I catch would be dead within a week or too anyway, very likely without spawning successfully.  Meanwhile, many of the alternative foods CyberBrook suggests I eat to get my Omega 3s etc. are grown thousands of miles from AK, and consume massive amount of fossil fuels in their cultivation and transport.  In contrast the nearest salmon-bearing stream is 1/4 mile from where I sit in a downtown Anchorage office building.  I can walk there on my lunch hour.

I will stick to Alaska salmon and halibut -- poor CyberBrook doesn't know what s/he is missing!

Mercury in Seafood

A FREE seafood-mercury calculator that allows you to estimate your personal mercury level based on your seafood eating habits is available at:

 www.GotMercury.org

Wild Alaskan salmon and skipjack tuna

Hi. The Slow Cook asked why I didn't specify which salmon and tuna to use in the recipes. In the article, I recommend that people stick with Wild Alaskan salmon and Skipjack tuna from Hawaii and California. I  based this recommendation on both health and environmental info culled from the Oceans Alice website as well as a few other sources. This information is updated as necessary, so it's worth looking at now and then to see if there have been any changes regarding your favorite kinds of fish.  I am assuming that most readers can take the information they glean from the article and apply it to the recipes.


Fish Not a Healthy Choice

See information below on seafood from the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine.

Fish not a healthy choice according to the PCRM ~
http://www.pcrm.org/news/commentary061024.html

Fish does not protect the heart, researchers say:
http://www.pcrm.org/cgi-bin/lists/mail.cgi?flavor=archive ...

Interesting marine information from the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society ~
http://www.seashepherd.org

Rationalize it any way you want...

but the truth of the matter is that eating seafood these days is one of the leading causes of ocean ecosystems destruction and planetary biodiversity loss (and ethically indefensible, if you really look at how it's done).  As more and more fish stocks plummet into oblivion, we justify continuing eating what remains as if those fish species aren't next on the list to be decimated.  If you haven't already, take a look at the Los Angeles Times Pulitzer Prize winning explanatory reporting for "Altered Oceans," a series that revealed how man has over-fished the oceans and polluted them with trash and basic nutrients -- decimating advanced sea life, making people sick, and effectively reversing the course of evolution back toward "the primeval seas of hundreds of millions of years ago."

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/oceans/la-oceans-series ...

Seems to me that Brook.com is one of the few that really grasps the gravity of it all, and is willing to speak to more than just easily acceptable band-aid solutions to the unprecedentedly enormous eco-problems that threaten us all.  It's gonna take a lot more than just changing our order from Atlantic salmon to Coho salmon to save the oceans.


Shrimp

Well, how can it be eco-conscious when it comes from China? I just found out that the shrimp sold at my local market comes from China. And you know there is a review taking place on the safety of seafood imported from China. I was so sad when I found this out becuase I love shrimp. I asked around and was told that locally farmed/raised shrimp taste really bad. Any news?

How to choose eco-friendly shrimp

Hi. Some shrimp are raised and harvested in ways that are less damaging to the environment. See the URL below to check out which kinds are your "best buy" from an environmental standpoint. You can decided for yourself if local shrimp taste bad. I think they taste fine.

http://www.oceansalive.org/eat.cfm?subnav=fishpage&gr ...

Avoiding fish that contain toxins...

Ms. Orr cites an article on the PCR website that essentially states that it's bad to eat fish that have toxins in them. Well, yes. It is. That's why it's helpful to have lists that show which species are least likely to contain these toxins. This article ends by stating that it's best to avoid all animal products, which is quite a leap and quite telling.

The next article she cites states that fish may not have the heart-healthy benefits that most health professionals believe they do. I will certainly be following this -- similar questions have been raised in the past few years about the cardiac benefits of hormone therapy with the result that hormone therapy is no longer prescribed specifically for cardiac health reasons alone -- but in the meantime I will rely on the current opinion of the majority of health professionals.

Two different issues...

Many of the readers who have written in are opposed to eating meat and fish, and that's fine. I completely support them in their decision to become vegans and vegetarians and I encourage them to express their opinion. I think that choosing to follow a vegan or vegetarian diet is great.

There are some people who are going to continue to eat fish, however, and they want to do so in the most environmentally-friendly way that they can. It's important that information about how to try to do that be available to them. If vegetarians who don't want anyone to eat fish write in and say that all fish are equally damaging to the environment to consume, then the people who still plan to eat fish might not think that it's worth taking the time and effort to try to eat the fish whose harvesting is least damaging to the fish stocks and the environment. Since people who currently plan to keep eating fish is a large group, I feel that I can have the greatest environmental impact by engaging them in issues involving the best way to do that. If I were to write only for vegans and vegetarians, I'd be "preaching to the choir" and wouldn't have the chance to change anyone's dietary behavior since they have already decided not to buy fish and meat. So, in order to have the greatest impact from an environmental standpoint, I have to address the folks who will be going out and buying fish but who are willing to make an effort to think about what they're buying and to change their buying patterns based on the best environmental information available.

In short, if you are a vegan or vegetarian who wants everyone to stop eating meat and fish, feel free to say so. But to claim that all fish are the same from an environmental or health standpoint isn't accurate. Not only does such a statement not strengthen an argument for vegetarianism, but it ultimately doesn't serve the environment well either.

have your fish and eat it too.

Fish is a healthy protein.  Our oceans are in deep deep trouble if we don't change our fishing habits soon.  There are contamination issues with certain fish, but there is absolutely no blanket statements that can be made.  It's tough to find real unbiased information about these topics.  This website has a LOT of information.

http://www.ecofish.com

The China Study

The Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine website has a great deal of excellent and interesting information, plus access to studies of nutrician:

http://www.pcrm.org/

For those interested in studies on fish and shellfish, just search on "fish."

Here is a 2004 PCRM report on fish and shellfish:

http://www.pcrm.org/health/reports/fish_report.html

The China Study also has much important information on diet and its' effect on health ~
http://www.thechinastudy.com/about.html

a (supposed) enviro-rag..

hi..i am somewhat gobsmacked that grist...a supposed enviro-rag..

is promoting the best way to cook/eat other sentient beings..

what 'next..?..

best cuts of veal..and how to slow-cook them..?

(w.t.f. are you thinking..!.)

vegankiwiguy

vegankiwiguy

No More Piscivory!

Well done, CyberBrook.  And well done, all others who have written, protesting the thoughtless, insensitive slaughter of fish, whether by hook or by net.

Let us proceed step by step, Philu.  Grist is rather backwards, and needs some time to catch up.  Let us let them do what they are ready to do; meanwhile, let us let them know where they should be headed.

Chickens deserve our true friendship! So do fish! So do other sentient beings! Let us learn to be kind.

Eating as if the earth matters...

One poster stated,  "I will rely on the current opinion of the majority of health professionals."

The information below is from the excellent "Eco-Eating" website posted by Cyberbrook:

"Many reputable and mainstream health organizations--including the American Cancer Society, American Dietetic Association, American Heart Association, American Institute for Cancer Research, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, National Heart Foundations (of various countries), Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, Prevention, Union of Concerned Scientists, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, World Health Organization, United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, and many others--all agree that a diet centered around fresh fruits, vegetables, and whole grains can significantly reduce the incidence of the leading causes of disease and death. Likewise, many reputable and mainstream environmental organizations--Greenpeace, National Resources Defense Council, Rainforest Action Network, World Watch, and various others--all agree that a plant-based diet can significantly reduce various major forms of environmental destruction. There are, of course, also many health and environmental organizations outside the mainstream that also support these positions."

The Eco-eating website is filled with much interesting and important information. Have a look:

Eco-Eating: Eating as if the Earth Matters
http://www.brook.com/veg

Give me a break

This is the second time in as many weeks that Grist has published a piece advocating eating dead animals. I am starting to think that I should stop subscribing and getting my environmental news elsewhere.

Seriously, Grist should know better. Trying to justify eating fish (or any other animal) is simply asinine. Do the people at Grist care about our planet at all? If so, they are extremely misinformed.

Sanctimonious fish-huggers?

Clearly, Grist has strayed from it's mission of definining for us ecological heathen what the razor-sharp barrier is between moral and immoral, ethical and unethical behavior. If humanity is ever to be saved from war, famine and pestilence, it is vital that every human being on the planet stop eating fish!  In fact, don't go out in the water, because you might snag seaweed out of it's fragile domain or tip over a rock that is the sacred home of a crayfish.  And stop walking, too, because everyone knows it is impossible to walk in the great outdoors without stepping on a bug.  And did anyone ever stop to think of the wildlife that existed in our gardens before we unceremoniously picked the fruit and vegetables for ourselves and left only the nutrient-poor stalks and roots behind to rot?  Good God, Grist!  How far will you stray from your mission?

I know!  I will fix this injustice and send Grist a message by reading some other web site! One that clearly tells me what I already know and agree with.

Oh, wait, I just read the About page.  Before anyone else decides to slam Grist for taking the middle ground, I suggest they do the same.  And, let s/he who has not sinned cast the first stone.

Tell your local market what you want - IT WORKS!

Hey folks, please go to fishwise.org and see what you can do to convince your local retailer (even Whole Foods!) to use their program. Give the people who provide seafood for us the tools to find the most sustainable fish available. And until you are positive that it's sustainable, don't buy shrimp!


Shrimp - some simple rules

Seafood Watch pocket guides will help you to support ocean-friendly choices. http://www.montereybayaquarium.org/cr/cr_seafoodwatch/dow ...
When you buy seafood, you need to ask - where is it from?  Is it farmed or wild? How was it caught?  These questions will help you find the best choice or a good alternative.  A simple rule for shrimp - look for U.S. wild-caught or farmed, and avoid imported shrimp of both kinds.  If you feel you need to know why, you can read our peer-reviewed science reports on our web site.  Or you can trust that we have done the research, so that you don't have to.  Your choices can and do make a difference.

Please also boycott Canadian seafood

I still advocate for grilling some marinated tofu or seitan rather than meat or seafood, but I thank Roz for providing this info because I do agree that some seafood choices are better than others.

If you do consume seafood, please boycott any type of seafood from Canada because of the commercial seal slaughter for fur, which is conducted by the fishing industry. The Canadian fishing industry blames the harp seals for the decline in the cod fishery, though all evidence points to human overfishing as the main culprit. Common types of Canadian seafood include snow crab, shrimp lobster, and cod.  In the U.S., Country of Origin Labelling (COOl) for seafood will tell you what country the item is from.  For more info, visit www.ProtectSeals.org

Boycott Canadian Seafood

The letter below was published in the Gainesville Sun in March of 2005.

The first day of the annual largest and cruelest mass commercial slaughter of marine animals on earth is March 29th. Buoyed by fashion fads and pelt sales to Russia, Ukraine, Poland and China, Canadian fisherman will butcher over 325,000 seals this Spring..

On the Canadian east coast, harp and hood seals are systematically massacred by fisherman using rifles and shotguns.  Helpless baby seals less than four weeks old are bludgeoned by clubs and often dragged for long distances.  Approximately 42% are skinned alive.

It's estimated that for every seal shot and included in the quota, another escapes to die an agonizing death under the ice.

This barbarism is heavily subsidized by the Canadian government.  Canadian Fisheries and Oceans officials bow to fishing industry blackmail by claiming  seals destroyed the cod industry.  They're scapegoating defenseless seals to deflect criticism of  their  incompetent management of the Canadian fishing industry that has plundered the Grand Banks for decades

Americans  can help stop the carnage by joining the International Boycott of Canadian Seafood. Write Prime Minister Paul Martin ( pm@pm.gc.ca ) to tell him you will not buy Canadian seafood or visit Canada until this unspeakable bloodbath jeopardizing the North Atlantic ecosystem is stopped.

To learn more about the seal slaughter, visit The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society
( http://www.seashepherd.org/ ) and The Humane Society of the United States (http://www.ProtectSeals.org )

Karen Orr
Gainesville, Florida

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

The comments of Grist users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?


Also in Grist

The Week's Most Popular
From the Archives
No (Hot) Dogs Allowed, by Roz Cummins. A guide to grilling without red meat.
Tastes Like Summer, by Roz Cummins. Berries, brewpubs, and a blitz torte recipe.
Ifs, Ands, and Nuts, by Roz Cummins. On summer memories and politically correct peanut butter.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Jobs Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcasts
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra® | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2007. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks