Support Grist
Support nonprofit, independent environmental journalism.
Donate to Grist.
Ask Umbra

The Saga of Fume

On exerting yourself in traffic

By Umbra Fisk
02 Jul 2008
Tools: print | email | discuss | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS
Got questions about the environment? Ask Umbra.
Got questions about the environment? Ask Umbra.
question Dear Umbra,

I bus, bike, or walk to work 98 percent of the time. I was wondering, when I'm biking (or walking, for that matter), am I inhaling more pollutants than those around me who are emitting them from their gas-guzzlers? Your answer won't change my habits, since I'm not going to drive to work anytime soon -- I'm just wondering if I'm the one paying the price for my enviro-friendly commuting? Thanks for your help!

Sara
Tucson, Ariz.

answer Dearest Sara,

What dedication. Even if biking is slowly filling your lungs with particulate silt, and a car is truly the capsule of protection that it seems, you will choose biking. For the Earth. Fortunately, though you are willing to sacrifice your health on the altar of environmentalism, biking is not worse than being inside the car.

Biking in traffic
Spare the ride, spoil the wild?
A car shell contains little gaps into which pollutants flow, and as a result, car occupants sit in a stew of carbon monoxide, benzene, and particulate matter, among other unpleasant vehicle emissions. Bicyclists, bus passengers, and pedestrians are all exposed to these emissions as well, but in a different way. I wrote about this dilemma a few years ago, and just reviewed some of the old and new literature. It seems that cyclists almost always encounter fewer pollutants with each breath than car passengers -- that's a special way to say that the foul mix of toxics is denser in the car than in the cycling zone. Cyclists are breathing more heavily than those sedentary drivers, as you know, so at the very worst their total exposure becomes the same as car passengers. At least that's what I've managed to put together from the various studies. The bus and the sidewalk are, like the bicycle, on the edge of the toxic air zone; presumably riders and walkers are not breathing hard like a cyclist, and have lower total exposure.

It is ironic that as cyclists, pedestrians, and bus riders, we contribute to public health by reducing pollutants, while at the same time we share the same health hazards as those within automobiles.

A few variables in these studies are worth mentioning and considering for all kinds of transit. Just as you would guess, pollutants are lower on less-travelled routes and during less-travelled times of day. Pollutant concentrations are very influenced by the vehicle just in front of you, so it's better not to follow, say, a diesel truck in poor condition. Pollutant levels are also lowest in the carpool lane -- which doesn't help cyclists, but does offer a bit of hope to drivers.

Get Umbra in your In-Box
Sign up for Ask Umbra email alerts, sent twice a week.
Email address:
Zip/postal code:
-
As I mentioned, I wrote about this topic a few years back, and I'm not averse to revisiting a topic even if no new data has arisen (Diapers! Diapers! Don't forget to wear diapers while cycling!). In this case, I do have something new to say: Even sitting in a parked car may be toxic. There have been a few studies examining the offgassing toxins from new car interiors. One older Aussie study looked at new cars and found emissions of benzene, toluene, acetone, and other, unfamiliar -enes and -ones. In 2006, the Ecology Center, a Michigan nonprofit, found that the dust and windshield film of tested cars contained unsafe amounts of PBDEs (a type of flame retardant) and phthalates (plastics softeners). All these compounds are hazardous to our health, and our kids' health.

To be fair, these studies did not study human uptake of these toxins, only their presence. Maybe they all magically flow out the windows. All the more reason to keep your car windows open.

And, of course, all the more reason to bike when we can.

Shiftily,
Umbra



Tools: print | email | discuss | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS
Yours is to wonder why, hers is to answer (or try). Please send Umbra any nagging question pertaining to the environment -- but first check out her FAQs!
The claims made in this column may not reflect the views of this magazine. Neither the magazine nor the author guarantees that any advice contained in this column is wise or safe. Please use this column at your own risk.
Umbra Fisk is Grist Research Associate II, Hardcover and Periodicals Unit, floors 2B-4B.
< Previous | Next >
Comments: (5 comments)

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

Masks

Thanks for the information.

Is there any justification for the filter masks some cyclists wear in urban areas? Do they appreciably reduce pollution inhalation?

a sibilant intake of breath

Masks

Yes! I have an "I Can Breathe" mask and it helps a lot. I have asthma and there are a lot of places I couldn't go without it.

http://goodwordswan.wildflowerstew.com
The nose knows...

Just blow your nose on a (hopefully) clean handkerchief after a long, urban bike ride. See that grime in there with the formerly bits of you?

A mask certainly can help keep the particulates down but it's hot in the summer and likely will steam your glasses as you huff-and-puff, so be careful.

The one bit of bummer on this note is the "sudden death by REALLY REALLY LARGE particle" problem, otherwise known as a vehicle, bearing down on you blindly as the driver simultaneously dials phone, eats bagel and changes iTune settings.

Recycle vegetable oil in your recycled Mercedes diesel!

A Little bit of balance to the discussion...

I also am a bicycle commuter and have worried about this some, and I understand the concerns. I also happen to be getting my Ph.D. studying engine emissions measurements and mitigation. I think that Umbra's response makes out automobiles to be terrible polluting machines, which is really just not the case, at least for cars less than, say, 5 years old. For gasoline powered cars, the air emitted from the exhaust pipe is probably cleaner than the air taken in at the front, due to the high efficiency of the combustion process and the even higher efficiency of the catalytic cleansing system.
The real danger is presented by older diesel vehicles (the newer ones 2007 and later are held to the same standards as the gas-powered) emit a lot of particulate matter (you can see and smell it) and NOx, which are both lung irritants. It would be wise to ride your bike where the buses and big rigs don't go, but there's not much to fear, pollutant-wise from most of the passenger cars on the road.
In the end, remember too that the human nose is incredible sensitive to hydrocarbons, and if there are any present, in even tiny quantities, your nose will tell you. Move out of the way, and the next breeze will clear the air, so to speak. As for NOx and ozone, these are usually only a problem in the hottest parts of the hottest days and concentrated near the highways where the big rigs run. Not taking your bike on the highway is always sound advice for more than air quality reasons...
Here endeth the lesson.

always wondered if those ionizer thingies work

I have one of those ionizer 'air cleaner' thingies in my cigarette lighter - always wondered if it actually works or if it's just a good luck charm for my air.  Better than a stinky tree, I suppose.

I don't know if this makes a lick of difference but I compulsively change my auto's airflow from 'fresh' to 'recycle' when I'm behind another vehicle that stinks or puts out visible fumes.  I'm sure this isn't entirely scientific since there's bad stuff you can't see or smell, but it soothes me and I'm the one who has to put up with me.

Back in my bike-riding daze I would try to avoid stinky cars, avoid hanging behind idling cars at intersections, hold my breath when possible & necessary, anything to cut the exposure.  

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

The comments of Grist users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?


Also in Grist

The Week's Most Popular
From the Archives
A Tip of the Cap, by Umbra Fisk. On carbon trading.
Unnecessary Evil, by Umbra Fisk. On short-haul flights.
Belt Experience, by Umbra Fisk. On car seat recycling.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Jobs Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcasts
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra® | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2007. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks