Support Grist
Support nonprofit, independent environmental journalism.
Donate to Grist.
Ask Umbra

Getting Sloshed

On wave power

By Umbra Fisk
01 Aug 2007
Tools: print | email | discuss | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS
Got questions about the environment? Ask Umbra.
Got questions about the environment? Ask Umbra.
question Hello Umbra,

I just read a little bit about wave power and was wondering what you think the future potential is for this clean and never-ending energy source?

Peter Blomquist
Orlando, Fla.

answer Dearest Peter,

Wow. I'm a sucker for anything with a good name, like "LIMPET." There are fun technologies under development to harness the might of the sea as it swells up from the briny deep.

Wave breaking in the surface.
Crest easy.
Photo: iStockphoto
Wind hits the surface of the ocean and makes tiny ripples that over distance and time become waves. As contrasted with the tidal technologies we discussed last week, which use the tidal cycles to trap and release water, wave devices use the constant sloshing and swelling of the ocean to generate energy. Wave power technologies come in three broad categories: on shore, near shore, and offshore. And then three more categories: Buoyant Moored Device, Hinged Contour Device, and Oscillating Water Column. I'll give you just a few examples out of the truckloads I found.

Islay, Scotland, has an Oscillating Water Column called the LIMPET (an acronym), a 500 kW onshore wave-power generator. The LIMPET is a concrete bunker on the beach with a large central cavity, into which waves slosh. As water rises and falls within the cavity it displaces air, which exits and returns via a turbine-clogged tunnel. The spinning turbine is attached to a generator that, among other things, powers a Scottish bus -- here is a site with an animated show for you.

Offshore devices, in depths above 80 feet, include a long, segmented tube called the Pelamis, after a type of sea snake. The wave-induced gyrations of this Hinged Contour Device drive hydraulic pistons that send electricity to shore through cables on the sea floor. Then you have Buoyant Moored Devices, which look like signal buoys, with a central piston sloshing up and down as the sea swells; this mechanical stroking is connected to a generator as well. A wave farm would be a conglomerate area with several devices, much like a wind farm.

LIMPET in Islay, Scotland.
I read only promising information about wave power's capacities. A lot of development is occurring in Europe, where public enthusiasm and government commitment to renewables means funding and research support. Additionally, Western Europe happens to have bountiful wave-rich sites. Wave power is most promising around 40 to 60 degrees of latitude in both the Southern and Northern Hemispheres (there's a map here), particularly on the west coasts of Britain and the United States. I've seen one estimate that wave power could contribute 1 to 10 terawatts of energy worldwide -- the U.S. uses about 3 to 4 TW annually, and the world about 13 TW.

Interesting design problems with wave power include the destructive power of the salty sea -- corrosion and weather and storms and all. Benefits include the relative constancy of power availability, as contrasted with wind and tidal barrages. I'm running out of room, so I'll just say that one last drawback to wave power is that the near-shore ocean is now considered a recreational site full of beauty, not a working area, and so wave farms may meet the same resistance that has met many a wind farm. I eagerly await your letters on the subject.

Goodbyely,
Umbra



Tools: print | email | discuss | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS
Yours is to wonder why, hers is to answer (or try). Please send Umbra any nagging question pertaining to the environment -- but first check out her FAQs!
The claims made in this column may not reflect the views of this magazine. Neither the magazine nor the author guarantees that any advice contained in this column is wise or safe. Please use this column at your own risk.
Umbra Fisk is Grist Research Associate II, Hardcover and Periodicals Unit, floors 2B-4B.
< Previous | Next >
Comments: (4 comments)

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

A little nitpick

Regarding energy vs. power.  You state that the US uses 3 to 4 TW annually.  A terawatt is a unit of power, not energy; that is, it is a rate of energy use (or production or transfer or whatever), not an amount of energy, so it doesn't make sense to say that we consume 3 to 4 TW in a year. According to the DOE, annual US energy consumption is around 100 quadrillion BTUs, or about 29000 terawatt-hours. With 8766 hours in a year, this translates to an average consumption of about 3.3 TW.  So the numbers seem right, but it's a rate of energy use, not an amount of energy used.  Sorry for the pedantry, but it never hurts to be clear on these things.
Love the column, by the way.  Keep up the good work.


breakwaters

It would seem to me that systems like LIMPET could be installed along the breakwaters of our port cities. These are normally manmade structures with little aesthetic or recreational value. The only drawback, albeit a major one, is they tend to become home to seals and sea lions who like to play in the waves. However with creative thinking, it should be possible to turn these walls of rock and broken concrete into power generators.

It seems a shame that no one in North America is moving along these lines.

Aesthetics could go a long way

No one wants to see ungly and imposing industrial wave power structures near shore.  But, incorporate some "female energy" into this issue and it could become power generating art.  Think of attractive Buoyant Moored Devices that are like bobbing sculptures.  I certainly wouldn't want to see wave power structures in any protected wilderness/natural areas, but why not in developed areas?  Here's a challenge to engineers: pair up with an artist and start a new eco-power ocean art movement!

Wave Power

A newish technology developed in Australia addresses some of these issues.
Check out: http://www.oceanlinx.com/
Not only is this system capable of being aesthetically pleasing it is also more efficient than most others and can also desalinate water!
The International Academy of Science recently named the Energetech wave energy technology (now renamed as Oceanlinx) as
one of the ten most outstanding technologies in the world for 2006.

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

The comments of Grist users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?


Also in Grist

The Week's Most Popular
From the Archives
Take Me To Your Seeder, by Umbra Fisk. On feeding birds.
Tide Died, by Umbra Fisk. On tidal power.
Frigi-Dare, by Umbra Fisk. On refrigerator downsizing.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Jobs Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcasts
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra® | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2007. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks