Support Grist
Support nonprofit, independent environmental journalism.
Donate to Grist.
Ask Umbra

Thin Is In

On thin-film solar panels

By Umbra Fisk
06 Jun 2007
Tools: print | email | discuss | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS
Got questions about the environment? Ask Umbra.
Got questions about the environment? Ask Umbra.
question Dear Umbra,

I read that thin-film solar panels are now being produced on a wider scale. I always hear that they can be sandwiched into window glass, but are there any companies that are actually using the technology in architectural products? How does thin film compare to the traditional PV panel?

Jen
Oakland, Calif.

answer Dearest Jen,

Thin films compare well to the traditional photovoltaic panel, and are commercially available in such form as roofing tiles, which I count as architectural products. That's the short answer. The long, exhaustive answer you'll have to read somewhere else -- but I can give you the mid-sized, CliffsNotes answer. Umbra and Science, united once again in a zany matchup of wit and accuracy.

Chillin' with da thin solar
No s'mores over the campfire for these guys.
Photo: NASA
Thin films -- which are known as such not because they appear thinner (though they do), but because their manufacturing process involves applying multiple thin layers of sun-transforming substance onto a base material -- are themselves photovoltaic. They magically transform photons of light from the distant sun into voltage current that feeds our electrical systems. Not all solar energy is photovoltaic. Passive solar, in which you invite sun directly through windows and trap it in objects and the air, is not, and neither are solar water-heater systems. Traditional PV systems are the shiny black and silver squares of solar cells that you see linked together in giant rooftop slabs or atop roadside call boxes.

PV cells use the atomic properties of silicon (or other semiconductors) to trap energy, create electricity, and move that electricity through and out of the PV array into your home. I guess it's not that important that we go over why silicon is a good element for this purpose, but I do have to mention the jargon: after "doping" the silicon with impurities such as boron, PV makers can create the perfect electricity-producing sun sandwich. Skipping how this happens -- and editing out my professional-cycling doping imagery written to help you picture the process -- is what allows this to be a short explanation. PV cells have been made from silicon for years because it is the perfect semiconductor. Turning silicon into PV cells is very energy intensive.

As I said, thin PV films are made by pasting layers onto a substrate (as opposed to the mysterious "ingot growth" and other methods of processing silicon). Other ways they compare to traditional silicon PV panels include: the conducting substance is not necessarily silicon, the manufacturing process may be less expensive, manufacturing can be automated and continuous -- companies can and do make huge sheets and small sheets without too much trouble -- and the use of flexible substrate means new potential uses. Such as, roofing tiles that look and act much like asphalt shingles, and glazing on skylights. Thin-film products are available for residential homes such as you yourself might own.

If you wish to read lots and lots more about how photovoltaic cells are made, or about doped silicon p-layer and n-layers, ingot growth, and physical vapor deposition, I really enjoyed the U.S. Department of Energy's very thorough EERE site. A one-page description can be found at GE's solar site, or at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory if you just want a wee bit more reading. I'll gingerly touch the "but should I get some solar panels?" topic post haste.

Ingotly,
Umbra



Tools: print | email | discuss | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS
Yours is to wonder why, hers is to answer (or try). Please send Umbra any nagging question pertaining to the environment -- but first check out her FAQs!
The claims made in this column may not reflect the views of this magazine. Neither the magazine nor the author guarantees that any advice contained in this column is wise or safe. Please use this column at your own risk.
Umbra Fisk is Grist Research Associate II, Hardcover and Periodicals Unit, floors 2B-4B.
< Previous | Next >
Comments: (7 comments)

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

Thinner is inner?

There are always newer and cooler ways to be greener, and thin-film PV is one of them. Lay stripes of this material on a transparent substrate-- like glass-- and you have a good translucent material for a skylight or over an outdoor arbor, or...

And don't let anyone try to tell you that it costs more carbon-laden energy to make these babies than they produce. Tell those folks to hush until they get the coal out of their portfolio.

PV energy costs

As for how much energy it takes to make PV modules, depending upon the technology and the geographical location, they will reach energy payback in 2-8 years. With long lives (35 yr. old modules are still making energy)reflected by their 20-25 yr. warranties, PV modules will make lots of carbon-free energy over their lifetimes.

Check out www.homepower.com

Dye-sensitised solar cells

There are also non-silicon alternatives, promising much less pollution and possibly cutting costs by 90% [http://masseynews.massey.ac.nz/2007/Press_Releases/04-04- ...]


Kim Davis Lighten up your steps... So met hin gsar eno tlik ethe yse emt obe...
What's the downside?

Seems like these things are just better than standard PV cells.  Why aren't they being used everywhere?  There's gotta be a catch...

Andrew Eisenberg
The gateway project is wrong---http://www.livableregion.ca
Solar Power from Glass

Check out http://www.us.schott.com/photovoltaic/english/products_us ... for information on building integrated PV. They make some very nice looking windows that generate electricity.

Regarding thin film, my understanding is that although it may be less expensive, it not as efficient at the more traditional PV panels that use mono or poly-crystalline materials.

There are many pros and cons with these different products so it's definitely not one-size-fits-all.

Steve Rypka GreenDream Enterprises www.greendream.biz

Re: What's the downside?

The downside is that thin film panels are generally less efficient than traditional solar PV cells, so you need more of them to get the same amount of energy out.

If a thin film panel costs half as much as a traditional panel, but is only half as efficient, you end up paying the same amount for the panels, but end up needing twice as much area to install them, more labor (typically) to mount the additional panels, more wiring (typically) to hook up the additional panels, etc. You end up paying more for the installation, so it can cost more to go with thin film.

But since thin films are so much more flexible, they can be used in a wider variety of applications. And there's much work going on to make thin films even less expensive and more flexible. If you believe the marketers, soon thin film solar will be dirt cheap and we'll be covering every available surface with them.


Grid-tied PV

The editor in chief of Mother Earth News magazine installed thin-film PV on her barn roof and outlined the process in an article:

http://www.motherearthnews.com/Alternative-Energy/2006-10 ...

Lots of good info on how much it costs and how it performs ...

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

The comments of Grist users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?


Also in Grist

The Week's Most Popular
From the Archives
The Trouble With Dribbles, by Umbra Fisk. On seltzer bottles.
Depositive Thinking, by Umbra Fisk. On returnable bottles.
Reflections, by Umbra Fisk. On albedo.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Jobs Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcasts
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra® | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2007. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks