Support Grist
Support nonprofit, independent environmental journalism.
Donate to Grist.
Ask Umbra

An Affinity That Chafes Our Ends

On recycled toilet paper

By Umbra Fisk
25 Sep 2006
Tools: print | email | discuss | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS
Got questions about the environment? Ask Umbra.
Got questions about the environment? Ask Umbra.
question Dear Umbra,

The few brands of recycled-content toilet paper available are nasty. Why is it so difficult to manufacture TP that's not from virgin trees but doesn't feel like bark on one's sensitive skin? What exactly is the technological barrier the nation's scientists must overcome in order to make a roll that's sensitive, both against our skin and environmentally?

Jennifer Stanley
Oakland, Calif.

answer Dearest Jennifer,

You'll be happy and perhaps surprised to learn that there are no technological barriers to creating soft toilet paper from recycled fibers -- just barriers to making it as soft as the virgin-tree-on-a-roll brands.

Roll with it, baby.
Roll with it, baby.
Photo: iStockphoto
The reason for this difference has to do with the fact that the texture of the starting fibers -- whether virgin or recycled -- influences the feel of the "end" product. (Ha ha.) Also, the fibers in paper shorten each time they're recycled, making recycled paper less strong than the virgin variety. To compensate for this, some manufacturers use resins or mechanical means that help the recycled fibers stick together better. But making paper stronger also tends to make it stiffer, bringing us back to your dilemma.

All is not lost, however: just as there are differences in softness between virgin brands, the recycled kind comes in a lot of different forms, some dramatically less sandpapery than others. Fortunately for all but the most sensitive of bums, truly soft (or soft-enough) recycled TP is out there -- even the cushy double-ply stuff. For what it's worth, the U.S. EPA's federal purchasing guide [PDF] even advises government tissue buyers to "avoid misconceptions about softness, absorbency, and strength. Some recycled-content sanitary tissue products are softer, stronger, and more absorbent." Though I don't often turn to the feds for enlightenment, in this case I think they're right.

Since you likely know all the reasons to buy recycled TP -- which boil down to protecting the endangered forests that keep our planet healthy -- I'd recommend a new approach. Buy a few brands you haven't tried and do a series of personal softness tests, keeping in mind the words of one Natural Resources Defense Council activist: "How soft do you need something to be that you use for five seconds a day?" If you find a couple of brands you can live with, choose the one with the highest amount of recycled content and -- presto -- you can wipe away both your guilt and your discomfort.

If you're still not satisfied, there are a few things you can do. You could start by writing letters to virgin TP companies telling them you want a soft recycled product and also to recycled TP companies telling them your bum is in distress, so please innovate, post-haste. You might also test some brands of recycled facial tissue on your other end and see if any of those meet your standards. If you want to stick with officially designated TP, I have it on good authority that folding creates a gentler effect than crumpling. And finally: you could always install a bidet attachment. How terribly cosmopolitan.

Any other ideas, readers? Let us know.

Rawly,
Umbra



Tools: print | email | discuss | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS
Yours is to wonder why, hers is to answer (or try). Please send Umbra any nagging question pertaining to the environment -- but first check out her FAQs!
The claims made in this column may not reflect the views of this magazine. Neither the magazine nor the author guarantees that any advice contained in this column is wise or safe. Please use this column at your own risk.
Umbra Fisk is Grist Research Associate II, Hardcover and Periodicals Unit, floors 2B-4B.
< Previous | Next >
Comments: (9 comments)

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

other non-chafing options

Hey All, wanted to point out that my office uses either Seventh Generation recycled toilet paper or Marcal, and neither band is nasty. However, if Jennifer needs more recycled options (try em all, why not): CVS Bathroom Tissue 1000, Cascades, Natural Value, Earth First, Trader Joe's, and 365 Everyday Value. www.kleercut.net has more brands of all sorts of recycled paper products. Also, perhaps people would be interested in emailing Thomas Falk, C.E.O of Kimberly-Clark, the company that makes its toilet paper with fiber from ancient forests (and makes us turn to the "nasty" brands). Check out http://kleercut.net/en/sendtokc for more information.


Let us not get distracted ...

from the real important [t]issue here ... should it hang down the back or over the front?

If a twigg falls in the forest but nobody is there to hear it, it's probably best because there is bound to be cussing.
No contest

Front.

lota

What's the need for paper?  A small jug of water works better.

Do not use facial tissue

Ever notice how when you use toilet paper when you sneeze, it rips apart? There's a reason for that.

According to wikipedia (and my dad):

"Toilet paper, which differs in composition from facial tissue, is designed to deteriorate when wet in order to keep drain pipes clear. Some types of toilet paper are designed to decompose in septic tanks, while other bathroom and facial tissues do not. Most septic tank manufacturers advise against using paper products that are non-septic tank safe."

Using facial tissue, even if it is recycled, is a very poor suggestion! Something is definitely not green if it causes damage to your plumbing and septic system.

Green Forest

I usually use Seventh Generation (which I find fine and not scratchy) but they did not have it at the store the other day so I bought Green Forest.

I have to say it was really soft and comparable to your basic Charmin.

I'll stick with Seventh Gen, as it has higher post-consumer recycled percentage (80% vs 40%), but if softness is your issue, try out Green Forest.

 

other options

Or you can radically reduce your TP usage by getting a bidet and cleaning with water rather than scratchy paper.

I've used the Bidetmaticat home for years, and it works really well.  It does take some getting used to, but it's actually much more comfortable than paper, and reduced TP usage dramatically.

As for concerns about increased water usage: paper manufacture is a very water-intensive and water-polluting process.  I don't have the figures in front of me, but I would bet that you use more water, indirectly, with TP than with a bidet.


duh

Front.

Although either way, my cat pulls it all down, so the TP in my house has to sit on the counter.

A possible solution

You could always go live in another country for a while. I spent a few years in eastern Europe and got totally used to some 'extreme' situations - like using newspaper, or old books ("take that, socialist realist literature!") Anyway, you'll come back and find that the recycled tp isn't bad at all. Now I like it way more than the poofy pillow stuffing brands.

(I alternate rolls: one front and then one back. Keeps everyone happy.)

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

The comments of Grist users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?


Also in Grist

The Week's Most Popular



From the Archives
As Phosphate Would Have It, by Umbra Fisk. On phosphates in detergents.
Follow Her LED, by Umbra Fisk. On LEDs.
Shaky Reasoning, by Umbra Fisk. On oil drilling and seismic activity.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Jobs Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcasts
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra® | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2007. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks