Support Grist
Support nonprofit, independent environmental journalism.
Donate to Grist.
Ask Umbra

All Washed Up

On replacing appliances

By Umbra Fisk
02 Jan 2006
Tools: print | email | discuss | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS
Got questions about the environment? Ask Umbra.
Got questions about the environment? Ask Umbra.
question Dear Umbra,

I've done the research, and I'm ready to buy my first front-loading washing machine. And then a pesky friend starts asking the tough questions. "Does your existing machine work?" Yes. "Are you going to sell it to someone else who will keep using it?" Yes. "So, two machines where there used to be one ... how is that better for the environment?" Can you help me answer this one? I'm facing the same issue on the transportation front, as I just convinced my spouse that he should sell his 2002 Subaru and buy a Toyota Prius.

Kathleen Whitson
Seattle, Wash.

answer Dearest Kathleen,

First off, appliances are not kidneys. There is no epic waiting list for used ones, because they are plentiful, and enter the market every day. When you sell yours, no hosannas will sound from on high. Either a household has the budget to own a washer, or it does not. And either there is money to buy a new, efficient washer, or there is not. We do not prevent appliance ownership through hoarding.

Washing machine.
Hoarding won't help.
Photo: Jim Orr/iStockphoto.
Your friend believes s/he is looking beyond your personal gain to the impact on society as a whole. Let us imagine the Whitson family washer and the washer of another family -- obviously the Joneses -- who are looking for a better, pre-owned machine. That's two households with two older, inefficient machines. When you get a new, efficient machine and the Joneses upgrade to your old one, then the two households are in toto more efficient. If we follow your friend's logic, s/he believes the first scenario -- the two old machines -- is better for society than the second. I do not.

What will the Joneses do with their old machine? Either send it to the scrap-metal heap (that's the third R, recycle) or sell it to the next people down the budgetary ladder (reuse!). Speaking of that ladder: there is an appliance trickle-down effect. You will eventually tire of your efficient machine, and it will enter the used-goods market. If no one bought efficient machines, they would never trickle down to those of us who can only afford pre-owned goods. In a personal example, I eagerly await the day my mother tires of her new Prius and deigns to pass it along to me. There is no way I will ever buy a new Prius or any other hybrid; I can only hope for the dregs.

In The Same Vein
Get a Load of This
On washing machines
Let's affirm our victory over pesky friends and wrap up with all the positive aspects of buying a new, efficient washer: lower water and water-heater use; less generated sewage; consumer support of energy-efficient technologies; cleaner, longer-lasting garments; inspiring similar behaviors in others; and last and least, affecting the durable-goods index. Your personal energy impact will be improved in every way. The only possible downside is showing "consumer confidence" during the Bush administration. But as I've said before, efficient appliances are the right move.

Now that we have that out of the way, I have to tell my story about the Seattle dump. It's related, because I was paying for some yard waste at the exit and (thinking always of you, dearest readers) asked the agent what happens to collected appliances. He spoke for a few minutes about how they charge a flat fee for all appliances, how those without refrigerants are sold for scrap metal, and how that subsidizes the disposal of refrigerants from other machines. Then, without pausing at all, he said, "But the most important thing is to treat yourself real well, and don't accept anything less than love and appreciation." I will leave you with that thought.

Lovingly,
Umbra



Tools: print | email | discuss | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS
Yours is to wonder why, hers is to answer (or try). Please send Umbra any nagging question pertaining to the environment -- but first check out her FAQs!
The claims made in this column may not reflect the views of this magazine. Neither the magazine nor the author guarantees that any advice contained in this column is wise or safe. Please use this column at your own risk.
Umbra Fisk is Grist Research Associate II, Hardcover and Periodicals Unit, floors 2B-4B.
< Previous | Next >
Comments: There are no comments. Be the first to post!

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

The comments of Grist users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?


Also in Grist

The Week's Most Popular
From the Archives
Prints Charming, by Umbra Fisk. On ecological footprints, again.
Won't You Be My Neighbor?, by Umbra Fisk. On co-housing.
Moving Light Along, by Umbra Fisk. On LED holiday lights.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Jobs Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcasts
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra® | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2007. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks