Support Grist
Support nonprofit, independent environmental journalism.
Donate to Grist.
Ask Umbra

Do the Bath

On heating with bathwater

By Umbra Fisk
16 Nov 2005
Tools: print | email | discuss | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS
Got questions about the environment? Ask Umbra.
Got questions about the environment? Ask Umbra.
question Dear Umbra,

After a hot bath, I leave the water in the tub so the heat will go into the room. My husband says the heat saved is inconsequential. How would one calculate the BTUs saved this way?

J. Reiman
Helena, Mont.

answer Dearest J.,

I do that too. I'm trying to heat the entire office building with my baths, and I've been making my editor bring me my encyclopedias in the tub.

Rubber duck in bath.
Ay, there's the tub.
Roughly speaking (and cut me a little slack, you professional science geeks), a BTU, or British thermal unit, is the amount of energy needed to raise a pound of water 1 degree Fahrenheit; likewise, when a pound of water cools 1 degree, it releases one BTU. Since "a pint is a pound the world around" -- even in Britain, home of the BTU -- here's what I suggest: measure the length, width, and height of the bath you usually take, multiply to get cubic inches, convert to gallons, then to pints. Then call those pints pounds (yes, I know, a pint of water actually weighs 1.04-ish pounds, but bear with me). For instance, my sources tell me a typical bath uses about 40 gallons of water, which is 320 pounds.

Then, with a thermometer of some kind -- maybe a meat thermometer would work, or even a body thermometer -- measure the temperature of the bath at the beginning (we'll say 110 degrees), and the temperature before you drain the water (we'll say 70 degrees). Now we collect the math ingredients and do a word problem. We lost 40 degrees of 320 pounds of water, which is 12,800 BTUS. Where did the BTUs go, and did they have an eventual impact on your home heating bill? Or perhaps the germane question is, what number of BTUs is "consequential"?

One truth known by we ersatz scientists is that perception is a large part of warmth. So 12,800 BTUs mistily roaming around the air near the bathroom will make you feel warmer, just as a hot kitchen will warm you -- whether or not it affects when your furnace kicks in. The consequence to your heat bill is dependent on your type of heat, the draftiness of your home, and the location of your thermostat.

This may be a marital argument with no resolution, although I of course have two further suggestions. One is, before hubby reads this column, ask him how many bath BTUs he would consider "consequential," then compare his answer to mine. Second is, aside from higher mold risk and drowning hazards, there can't be much harm in letting the bath stand as it cools.

Logically,
Umbra

P.S.: Many thanks to those of you who wrote to tell me about hot-water-saving gadgets. More fodder for a future column!



Tools: print | email | discuss | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS
Yours is to wonder why, hers is to answer (or try). Please send Umbra any nagging question pertaining to the environment -- but first check out her FAQs!
The claims made in this column may not reflect the views of this magazine. Neither the magazine nor the author guarantees that any advice contained in this column is wise or safe. Please use this column at your own risk.
Umbra Fisk is Grist Research Associate II, Hardcover and Periodicals Unit, floors 2B-4B.
< Previous | Next >
Comments: (3 comments)

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

Do the bath - reheating moist air

Presumably one should also factor in the extra energy required to heat the now moist air once it has cooled. It requires much more energy to heat moist air than dry air. So I'm guessing that any benefit is probably cancelled out.

However, I have heard of a heat recovery system that takes the warm water drained from the bath and uses it to heat the hot water tank (no the water sources don't mix). Now that seems like a good idea!


12,800 BTUs

So that would be about 12 ounces of heating oil saved.

Do the bath

I'm no phase phreak, but I do remember something about latent heat of vaporization from college physics (or was it a Frank Zappa song...).  Doesn't the evaporating warm water CONSUME 600 cal/gm of water that "moves" from liquid to gas?  Should that amount of heat be subtracted from Umbra's calculation? Is it significant?

Probably better to just point out that most showers use a fraction of the heated water (assuming flow control nozzle in place) compared to a bath.  So, unless the candles are burning along with the passion, just hose it off.

The comments of Grist users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?


Also in Grist

The Week's Most Popular



From the Archives
Ozoning Out, by Umbra Fisk. On climate confusion.
Buzz Alterin', by Umbra Fisk. On coffee.
Hot Hot Heat, by Umbra Fisk. On waiting for warm water.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Jobs Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcasts
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra® | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2007. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks