Support Grist
Support nonprofit, independent environmental journalism.
Donate to Grist.
Ask Umbra

Maple Encyclical

On organic syrup

By Umbra Fisk
30 Aug 2004
Tools: print | email | discuss | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS
Got questions about the environment? Ask Umbra.
Got questions about the environment? Ask Umbra.
question Dear Umbra,

I saw at the store there is "organic" maple syrup. Is there really a difference between organic and non-organic maple syrup? Do conventional farms spray the trees with massive amounts of pesticides? I don't have much money (poor college student) so I was just trying to buy organic for things like apples and milk, which I've heard should only be bought in organic form.

Brianna
Farmington Hills, Mich.

answer Dearest Brianna,

Waffles and maple syrup
Good to the last drop.
You'll never hear me saying anything negative about maple syrup (except maybe "it's all gone").

The U.S. Department of Agriculture currently regulates use of the "organic" label, but this is a recent development. When the organic industry demonstrated remarkable economic growth during the 1990s, the feds decided they should step in and standardize the various state and independent certification requirements. The organic label is an actual label and affirms that producers have adhered to certain guidelines (and paid a certification fee). I provide these details in order to differentiate the organic label from simple advertising claims such as "natural" or "free range," which are, for all intents and purposes, meaningless, and to point out that a producer must be willing and able to pay a fee in order to gain the federal label. In your fair state of Michigan, ranked seventh in U.S. maple syrup production, you may well buy syrup from small sugar houses that use sustainable practices but don't produce enough sweet liquor to make organic certification fees economical.

You probably know that syrup is gathered through small holes drilled in maple trees. It falls under the "wild-crop harvesting" section of the National Organic Standards, which states in part, "A wild crop must be harvested in a manner that ensures that such harvesting or gathering will not be destructive to the environment ..." In an organic sugar bush, as in any organic system, additives are strictly regulated and synthetic chemicals are generally not allowed. Organic certifiers ask producers how they control rodents, whether they spray pesticides on trees, and whether chemicals are used to keep tap holes open. Sap transforms to syrup over hours in a boiling, foaming evaporator; organic producers are prohibited from using certain chemicals to reduce foaming. Most of them use allowable, traditional de-foaming agents instead: butter or oil. (Sorry, vegans.) The federal organic rules don't include any standards specific to maple syrup, but best practices call for organic producers to refrain from over-tapping or overburdening trees -- for example, by tapping trees only of a certain diameter or greater.

So the answer to the first half of your question is yes: There can be important differences between organically labeled syrup and unlabeled syrup. Then there's the other half of your question -- whether that difference is vital enough to merit burdening your student budget. I don't think it is. Unless you're mainlining syrup. I would continue to prioritize fruits and vegetables, which should make up the bulk of your diet and hence warrant organic attention. Check out this handy shopper's guide, which lists high- and low-pesticide crops so you can see at a glance which fruits and vegetables are most important to buy organic. Keep eating syrup, and if you buy direct from small producers, I'm sure they'll be happy to answer any questions you have about their production techniques.

Sweetly,
Umbra



Tools: print | email | discuss | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS
Yours is to wonder why, hers is to answer (or try). Please send Umbra any nagging question pertaining to the environment -- but first check out her FAQs!
The claims made in this column may not reflect the views of this magazine. Neither the magazine nor the author guarantees that any advice contained in this column is wise or safe. Please use this column at your own risk.
Umbra Fisk is Grist Research Associate II, Hardcover and Periodicals Unit, floors 2B-4B.
< Previous | Next >
Comments: There are no comments. Be the first to post!

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

The comments of Grist users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?


Also in Grist

The Week's Most Popular



From the Archives
Energy Asterisk, by Umbra Fisk. On Energy Star labels.
Grow With the Flow, by Umbra Fisk. On hydroponic farming.
Food-Altering Substance, by Umbra Fisk. On genetically modified foods.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Job Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcast
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | Weekly Recipes | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2008. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks