Support Grist
Support nonprofit, independent environmental journalism.
Donate to Grist.
Ask Umbra

Vegging Out

Advice on antioxidant-rich foods and why they cost so much

By Umbra Fisk
21 Jun 2004
Tools: print | email | discuss | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS
Got questions about the environment? Ask Umbra.
Got questions about the environment? Ask Umbra.
question Dear Umbra,

Antioxidant foods are "the thing" right now, and I would love to be able to eat as many as I need. However, they are usually the most expensive fruits and vegetables. Would it not make sense for farmers or producers to grow these products in greater volume, so we could all afford them and be able to eat healthier more easily? How difficult would such an adjustment in crops be for farmers in terms of land use, chemicals, etc.?

Oxidated


answer Dearest Oxidated,

The crux of your question seems to be: Why don't farmers make my favorite foods less expensive? Forgive me, but I think you're asking the wrong question. Let me explain.

broccoli and peppers
The producers.
Photo: USDA.
I barely understand the antioxidant concept, but I'm told most green, yellow, and orange fruits and vegetables contain the heralded antioxidant properties. I don't think you need to worry about the volume of veggies grown. You can be sure that the antioxidant fad is reflected in hectares of broccoli sprouting across California and Mexico, replacing some out-of-fashion veggie (let's hope it's the lima bean).

The first thing I would say is that food in the U.S. is cheap. We spend 10 percent of our income on food, less than any other country's citizens. That doesn't mean everyone in the U.S. can afford to buy food, of course -- there are other factors in play, such as the cost of housing and the minimum wage. Still, consumers are now accustomed to low food prices and, like you, demand them.

The reason I'm answering your question, though, is to disabuse you of the notion that farmers set the price for food. It is a lucky farmer who controls the cost of their product in the United States. About a quarter of each dollar you spend on food goes to the grower. Cheap food is partially a result of government subsidies and price controls that keep consumer costs down, pay farmers to fallow fields or cull herds, and endeavor to control the food market to the benefit of farmers and consumers. Weather also plays a role, and international markets, and the distribution chain is locked around the whole thing.

I know you've heard about industry consolidation all over corporate America. It's happened in the wholesale grocery industry as well, and in combination with vertical integration has spelled disaster for farmer and consumer influence on food markets. Vertical integration means one company is controlling aspects of business that used to be split among separate companies -- farm pickup, brokering, packing, and shipping to grocery stores may now be combined. It gives the business even more price control. A consolidated grocery wholesaling behemoth controls a vast portion of the produce market and through that influence is able to control what's grown, how it's packaged, and what the farmer gets paid for it. So few options exist that large farmers have nowhere else to go should they want higher prices for their antioxidating oranges.

The only entities likely to control the price of the food you buy are the wholesaler and perhaps the affiliated store itself. You can complain about prices to your grocer, and if enough folks gripe you might see a change. What I would suggest instead is sidestepping the whole system and buying directly from farmers in your area as often as you can. Your food will be fresher, and your money will go directly to a hardworking farmer and straight back into broccoli production. Hence you can reduce your risk of cancer and a farmer's risk of bankruptcy in one fell swoop.

Free radically,
Umbra



Tools: print | email | discuss | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS
Yours is to wonder why, hers is to answer (or try). Please send Umbra any nagging question pertaining to the environment -- but first check out her FAQs!
The claims made in this column may not reflect the views of this magazine. Neither the magazine nor the author guarantees that any advice contained in this column is wise or safe. Please use this column at your own risk.
Umbra Fisk is Grist Research Associate II, Hardcover and Periodicals Unit, floors 2B-4B.
< Previous | Next >
Comments: There are no comments. Be the first to post!

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

The comments of Grist users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?


Also in Grist

The Week's Most Popular
From the Archives
Girl on Film, by Umbra Fisk. On recycling videotapes and laser discs.
Bake Your Cake and Eat It Too, by Umbra Fisk. On getting a job in the "eco-field".
Waste Makes Haste, by Umbra Fisk. Answers about thermal depolymerization.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Jobs Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcasts
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra® | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2007. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks