Support Grist
Support nonprofit, independent environmental journalism.
Donate to Grist.
Ask Umbra

Burden of Roof

On eco-friendly roofs

By Umbra Fisk
27 Feb 2003
Tools: print | email | discuss | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS
Got questions about the environment? Ask Umbra.
Got questions about the environment? Ask Umbra.
question Dear Umbra,

Our roof is getting pretty old and starting to fall apart. It's one of those asphalt-shingle roofs that most houses have these days. Before we call the roofing company, I'd like to know what's the greenest kind of roofing material to use. Metal? Cedar? More asphalt? I'm sure lots of other readers would like to know, too!

Thanks,

Wally Bubelis
Seattle, Wash.

answer Dearest Wally,

Like other readers, you may need a drink or two to wade through the perplexing nexus of budgetary, aesthetic, and environmental concerns involved in making sustainable-building decisions. It sounds to me like you're looking for a life-cycle analysis of roofing materials, and none of the knowledgeable folks I spoke with could provide one. In other words, there is no way that I can answer your question. No, I'm not wimping out. Even my friend at Northwest Eco Building Guild says there is no clear answer. Let me explain:

It's roof, roof, roof for the home team.
Your asphalt roof lasted maybe 30 years. When you dismantle it, it could probably be partially recycled into pavement, but you'll have to call around to roofers and recyclers to see if this is an option in your area. Asphalt-shingle roofs are cheap and easy to install. Another cheap option would be a metal roof, which lasts for decades and amplifies the pitter patter of little rain drops. Although its manufacture may be energy-intensive, you may be able to find metal material with recycled content, and then recycle the roof when you're done. (Although, not to be morbid, a metal roof may last longer than you do.)

Other options: Cedar shingles may work for your roof's pitch and weather demands, and in your West Coast eco-city, it's possible to find sustainably harvested cedar certified by the Forest Stewardship Council, or salvaged from stumps left behind after logging. You could look into getting a thatch roof, or make an earthen plaster one. It is also possible to make a living roof, a roof covered with a layer of soil and growing plants. Sounds wacky, but homes and businesses are installing them around the country. Living roofs have excellent heating and cooling properties and they reduce storm water runoff.

How to choose? For starters, look for longevity of the material you use and its recycled or renewable content. All materials, even recycled ones, have some kind of manufacturing impact. Logically, the less often you need to replace your roof, the lower the manufacturing impact. But the best advice I can give you is to talk with a professional and work together to decide what will be best for your specific set of needs. Look around your city and see who can advise you about locally appropriate choices. In Seattle, you could start with BuiltGreen.net and the Environmental Home Center. Homeowners with rotting roofs in other parts of the world could also glean some useful information from these sites, as well as from the U.S. Green Building Council and the links on its web page. Follow the trail to a local or regional group that can begin to advise you.

Leakily,
Umbra



Tools: print | email | discuss | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS
Yours is to wonder why, hers is to answer (or try). Please send Umbra any nagging question pertaining to the environment -- but first check out her FAQs!
The claims made in this column may not reflect the views of this magazine. Neither the magazine nor the author guarantees that any advice contained in this column is wise or safe. Please use this column at your own risk.
Umbra Fisk is Grist Research Associate II, Hardcover and Periodicals Unit, floors 2B-4B.
< Previous | Next >
Comments: (2 comments)

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

The least expensive enviro-acceptable choice?

My 200-year-old house has a falling-apart asphalt shingle roof that needs replacing too. We would certainly consider adding a solar component, but this seems to be completely separate from the roof replacement. Is this the case?

If we're talking simple roof replacement on a budget, is the architectural grade shingle that most people use acceptable? I've been told it has a reasonably good amount of recycled material in it.

The least expensive enviro-acceptable choice?

My 200-year-old house has a falling-apart asphalt shingle roof that needs replacing too. We would certainly consider adding a solar component, but this seems to be completely separate from the roof replacement. Is this the case?

If we're talking simple roof replacement on a budget, is the architectural grade shingle that most people use acceptable? I've been told it has a reasonably good amount of recycled material in it.

The comments of Grist users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?


Also in Grist

The Week's Most Popular



From the Archives
Paint Cans, Paint Can'ts, by Umbra Fisk. On dealing with lead paint.
Housecapades, by Umbra Fisk. On homegrown activism.
Mosquito Veto, by Umbra Fisk. On mosquitoes.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Jobs Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcasts
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra® | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2007. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks